5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com
[ Upstream commit 6fcab2791543924d438e7fa49276d0998b0a069f ]
As reported in [1], a platform firmware update that increased the number of method parameters and forgot to update a least one of its callers, caused ACPICA to crash due to use-after-free.
Since this a result of a clear AML issue that arguably cannot be fixed up by the interpreter (it cannot produce missing data out of thin air), address it by making ACPICA refuse to evaluate a method if the caller attempts to pass fewer arguments than expected to it.
Closes: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/issues/1027 [1] Reported-by: Peter Williams peter@newton.cx Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede hansg@kernel.org Tested-by: Hans de Goede hansg@kernel.org # Dell XPS 9640 with BIOS 1.12.0 Link: https://patch.msgid.link/5909446.DvuYhMxLoT@rjwysocki.net Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/acpi/acpica/dsmethod.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/dsmethod.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/dsmethod.c index 97971c79c5f56..13c67f58e9052 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/dsmethod.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/dsmethod.c @@ -483,6 +483,13 @@ acpi_ds_call_control_method(struct acpi_thread_state *thread, return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_NULL_OBJECT); }
+ if (this_walk_state->num_operands < obj_desc->method.param_count) { + ACPI_ERROR((AE_INFO, "Missing argument for method [%4.4s]", + acpi_ut_get_node_name(method_node))); + + return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_AML_UNINITIALIZED_ARG); + } + /* Init for new method, possibly wait on method mutex */
status =