Re: [PATCH V4] blk-mq: avoid to starve tag allocation after allocation process migrates

On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 03:49:10PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:

When the allocation process is scheduled back and the mapped hw queue is changed, fake one extra wake up on previous queue for compensating wake up miss, so other allocations on the previous queue won't be starved.

This patch fixes one request allocation hang issue, which can be triggered easily in case of very low nr_request.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Omar Sandoval osandov@fb.com

Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval osandov@fb.com

The longer explanation you gave would be nice to have in the commit message, but maybe Jens can add that when he applies it.

Thanks, Ming!

Signed-off-by: Ming Lei ming.lei@redhat.com

V4:

• don't run smp_mb__before_atomic() for fake wake up as

suggest by Omar V3:

• fix comments as suggested by Jens
• remove the wrapper as suggested by Omar

V2:

• fix build failure

block/blk-mq-tag.c | 12 ++++++++++++ include/linux/sbitmap.h | 7 +++++++ lib/sbitmap.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++------------------- 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c index 336dde07b230..a4e58fc28a06 100644 --- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c +++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c @@ -134,6 +134,8 @@ unsigned int blk_mq_get_tag(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data) ws = bt_wait_ptr(bt, data->hctx); drop_ctx = data->ctx == NULL; do {

• struct sbitmap_queue *bt_prev;
  

• /*
  • We're out of tags on this hardware queue, kick any
  • pending IO submits before going to sleep waiting for

@@ -159,6 +161,7 @@ unsigned int blk_mq_get_tag(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data) if (data->ctx) blk_mq_put_ctx(data->ctx);

• bt_prev = bt;
  

  io_schedule();

data->ctx = blk_mq_get_ctx(data->q); @@ -170,6 +173,15 @@ unsigned int blk_mq_get_tag(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data) bt = &tags->bitmap_tags; finish_wait(&ws->wait, &wait);

• /*
  

•  * If destination hw queue is changed, fake wake up on
  

•  * previous queue for compensating the wake up miss, so
  

•  * other allocations on previous queue won't be starved.
  

•  */
  

• if (bt != bt_prev)
  

• 	sbitmap_queue_wake_up(bt_prev);
  

• ws = bt_wait_ptr(bt, data->hctx); } while (1);

diff --git a/include/linux/sbitmap.h b/include/linux/sbitmap.h index 841585f6e5f2..bba9d80191b7 100644 --- a/include/linux/sbitmap.h +++ b/include/linux/sbitmap.h @@ -484,6 +484,13 @@ static inline struct sbq_wait_state *sbq_wait_ptr(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq, void sbitmap_queue_wake_all(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq); /**

• • sbitmap_queue_wake_up() - Wake up some of waiters in one waitqueue
• • on a &struct sbitmap_queue.
• • @sbq: Bitmap queue to wake up.
• */

+void sbitmap_queue_wake_up(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq);

+/**

• sbitmap_queue_show() - Dump &struct sbitmap_queue information to a &struct
• seq_file.
• @sbq: Bitmap queue to show.

diff --git a/lib/sbitmap.c b/lib/sbitmap.c index e6a9c06ec70c..537328a98c06 100644 --- a/lib/sbitmap.c +++ b/lib/sbitmap.c @@ -335,8 +335,9 @@ void sbitmap_queue_resize(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq, unsigned int depth) if (sbq->wake_batch != wake_batch) { WRITE_ONCE(sbq->wake_batch, wake_batch); /*

•  * Pairs with the memory barrier in sbq_wake_up() to ensure that
  

•  * the batch size is updated before the wait counts.
  

•  * Pairs with the memory barrier in sbitmap_queue_wake_up()
  

•  * to ensure that the batch size is updated before the wait
  

•  * counts.
  

  */ smp_mb__before_atomic(); for (i = 0; i < SBQ_WAIT_QUEUES; i++)

@@ -425,21 +426,12 @@ static struct sbq_wait_state *sbq_wake_ptr(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq) return NULL; } -static void sbq_wake_up(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq) +void sbitmap_queue_wake_up(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq) { struct sbq_wait_state *ws; unsigned int wake_batch; int wait_cnt;

• /*

• * Pairs with the memory barrier in set_current_state() to ensure the
  

• * proper ordering of clear_bit()/waitqueue_active() in the waker and
  

• * test_and_set_bit_lock()/prepare_to_wait()/finish_wait() in the
  

• * waiter. See the comment on waitqueue_active(). This is __after_atomic
  

• * because we just did clear_bit_unlock() in the caller.
  

• */
  

• smp_mb__after_atomic();
• ws = sbq_wake_ptr(sbq); if (!ws) return;

@@ -454,23 +446,31 @@ static void sbq_wake_up(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq) */ smp_mb__before_atomic(); /*

•  * If there are concurrent callers to sbq_wake_up(), the last
  

•  * one to decrement the wait count below zero will bump it back
  

•  * up. If there is a concurrent resize, the count reset will
  

•  * either cause the cmpxchg to fail or overwrite after the
  

•  * cmpxchg.
  

•  * If there are concurrent callers to sbitmap_queue_wake_up(),
  

•  * the last one to decrement the wait count below zero will
  

•  * bump it back up. If there is a concurrent resize, the count
  

•  * reset will either cause the cmpxchg to fail or overwrite
  

•  * after the cmpxchg.
  

  */ atomic_cmpxchg(&ws->wait_cnt, wait_cnt, wait_cnt + wake_batch); sbq_index_atomic_inc(&sbq->wake_index); wake_up_nr(&ws->wait, wake_batch); }

} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sbitmap_queue_wake_up); void sbitmap_queue_clear(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq, unsigned int nr, unsigned int cpu) { sbitmap_clear_bit_unlock(&sbq->sb, nr);

• sbq_wake_up(sbq);

• /*

• * Pairs with the memory barrier in set_current_state() to ensure the
  

• * proper ordering of clear_bit_unlock()/waitqueue_active() in the waker
  

• * and test_and_set_bit_lock()/prepare_to_wait()/finish_wait() in the
  

• * waiter. See the comment on waitqueue_active().
  

• */
  

• smp_mb__after_atomic();
• sbitmap_queue_wake_up(sbq); if (likely(!sbq->round_robin && nr < sbq->sb.depth)) *per_cpu_ptr(sbq->alloc_hint, cpu) = nr;

} @@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ void sbitmap_queue_wake_all(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq) /* * Pairs with the memory barrier in set_current_state() like in

• * sbq_wake_up().
  

• * sbitmap_queue_wake_up().
  

  */ smp_mb(); wake_index = atomic_read(&sbq->wake_index);

-- 2.9.5