On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 10:57 PM Eddie James eajames@linux.ibm.com wrote:
The DPS310 chip has been observed to get "stuck" such that pressure and temperature measurements are never indicated as "ready" in the MEAS_CFG register. The only solution is to reset the device and try again. In order to avoid continual failures, use a boolean flag to only try the reset after timeout once if errors persist.
...
+static int dps310_ready(struct dps310_data *data, int ready_bit, int timeout) +{
int rc;
rc = dps310_ready_status(data, ready_bit, timeout);
if (rc) {
if (rc == -ETIMEDOUT && !data->timeout_recovery_failed) {
Here you compare rc with a certain error code...
/* Reset and reinitialize the chip. */
if (dps310_reset_reinit(data)) {
data->timeout_recovery_failed = true;
} else {
/* Try again to get sensor ready status. */
if (dps310_ready_status(data, ready_bit, timeout))
...but here you assume that the only error code is -ETIMEDOUT. It's kinda inconsistent (if you rely on internals of ready_status, then why to check the certain error code, or otherwise why not to return a real second error code). That's why I asked about re-using rc here.
In any case I don't think this justifies a v9, let's wait for your answer and Jonathan's opinion.
data->timeout_recovery_failed = true;
else
return 0;
}
}
return rc;
}
data->timeout_recovery_failed = false;
return 0;
+}