[ Sasha's backport helper bot ]
Hi,
Summary of potential issues: ℹ️ This is part 2/2 of a series ⚠️ Found matching upstream commit but patch is missing proper reference to it
Found matching upstream commit: f710202b2a45addea3dcdcd862770ecbaf6597ef
WARNING: Author mismatch between patch and found commit: Backport author: sergio.collado@gmail.com Commit author: Nathan Chancellornathan@kernel.org
Status in newer kernel trees: 6.15.y | Present (exact SHA1) 6.14.y | Not found
Note: The patch differs from the upstream commit: --- 1: f710202b2a45a ! 1: aea5c55c49b88 x86/tools: Drop duplicate unlikely() definition in insn_decoder_test.c @@ Metadata ## Commit message ## x86/tools: Drop duplicate unlikely() definition in insn_decoder_test.c
+ From Nathan Chancellor nathan@kernel.org + + [Upstream f710202b2a45addea3dcdcd862770ecbaf6597ef] + After commit c104c16073b7 ("Kunit to check the longest symbol length"), there is a warning when building with clang because there is now a definition of unlikely from compiler.h in tools/include/linux, which @@ Commit message Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar mingo@kernel.org Acked-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250318-x86-decoder-test-fix-unlikely-redef-v1-1-... + Signed-off-by: Sergio González Collado sergio.collado@gmail.com
## arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test.c ## @@ ---
NOTE: These results are for this patch alone. Full series testing will be performed when all parts are received.
Results of testing on various branches:
| Branch | Patch Apply | Build Test | |---------------------------|-------------|------------| | stable/linux-6.14.y | Success | Success |