From: Parav Pandit parav@nvidia.com
[ Upstream commit 1fe3e3166b35240615ab7f8276af2bbf2e51f559 ]
rate_bytes_ps is a 64-bit field. It passed as 32-bit field to apply_police_params(). Due to this when police rate is higher than 4Gbps, 32-bit calculation ignores the carry. This results in incorrect rate configurationn the device.
Fix it by performing 64-bit calculation.
Fixes: fcb64c0f5640 ("net/mlx5: E-Switch, add ingress rate support") Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit parav@nvidia.com Reviewed-by: Eli Cohen elic@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed saeedm@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 11 ++++++++--- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c index ec117e4414250..37051a4820a08 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ #include "lib/devcom.h" #include "lib/geneve.h" #include "diag/en_tc_tracepoint.h" +#include <asm/div64.h>
struct mlx5_nic_flow_attr { u32 action; @@ -3943,13 +3944,13 @@ errout: return err; }
-static int apply_police_params(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, u32 rate, +static int apply_police_params(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, u64 rate, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack) { struct mlx5e_rep_priv *rpriv = priv->ppriv; struct mlx5_eswitch *esw; + u32 rate_mbps = 0; u16 vport_num; - u32 rate_mbps; int err;
vport_num = rpriv->rep->vport; @@ -3966,7 +3967,11 @@ static int apply_police_params(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, u32 rate, * Moreover, if rate is non zero we choose to configure to a minimum of * 1 mbit/sec. */ - rate_mbps = rate ? max_t(u32, (rate * 8 + 500000) / 1000000, 1) : 0; + if (rate) { + rate = (rate * BITS_PER_BYTE) + 500000; + rate_mbps = max_t(u32, do_div(rate, 1000000), 1); + } + err = mlx5_esw_modify_vport_rate(esw, vport_num, rate_mbps); if (err) NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "failed applying action to hardware");