5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima kuniyu@amazon.com
When commit 390390240145 ("nfsd: don't allow nfsd threads to be signalled.") is backported to 5.10, it was adjusted considering commit 3feac2b55293 ("sunrpc: exclude from freezer when waiting for requests:").
However, 3feac2b55293 is based on commit f6e70aab9dfe ("SUNRPC: refresh rq_pages using a bulk page allocator"), which converted page-by-page allocation to a batch allocation, so schedule_timeout() is placed un-nested.
As a result, the backported commit 7229200f6866 ("nfsd: don't allow nfsd threads to be signalled.") placed freezable_schedule_timeout() in the wrong place.
Now, freezable_schedule_timeout() is called after every successful page allocation, and we see 30%+ performance regression on 5.10.220 in our test suite.
Let's move it to the correct place so that freezable_schedule_timeout() is called only when page allocation fails.
Fixes: 7229200f6866 ("nfsd: don't allow nfsd threads to be signalled.") Reported-by: Hughdan Liu hughliu@amazon.com Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima kuniyu@amazon.com Reviewed-by: Chuck Lever chuck.lever@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c +++ b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c @@ -679,8 +679,8 @@ static int svc_alloc_arg(struct svc_rqst set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); return -EINTR; } + freezable_schedule_timeout(msecs_to_jiffies(500)); } - freezable_schedule_timeout(msecs_to_jiffies(500)); rqstp->rq_pages[i] = p; } rqstp->rq_page_end = &rqstp->rq_pages[i];