From: Chris Mi cmi@nvidia.com
[ Upstream commit 4c8189302567f75099a336b0efcff8291ec86ff4 ]
Source port rewrite (forward to ovs internal port or statck device) isn't supported in the rule of split action. So there is no indirect table in split rule. The cited commit destroyes indirect table in split rule. The indirect table for other rules will be destroyed wrongly. It will cause traffic loss.
Fix it by removing the destroy function in split rule. And also remove the destroy function in error flow.
Fixes: 10742efc20a4 ("net/mlx5e: VF tunnel TX traffic offloading") Signed-off-by: Chris Mi cmi@nvidia.com Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan roid@nvidia.com Reviewed-by: Maor Dickman maord@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed saeedm@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c index 002567792e91e..829f703233a9e 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c @@ -656,7 +656,6 @@ mlx5_eswitch_add_fwd_rule(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
return rule; err_chain_src_rewrite: - esw_put_dest_tables_loop(esw, attr, 0, i); mlx5_esw_vporttbl_put(esw, &fwd_attr); err_get_fwd: mlx5_chains_put_table(chains, attr->chain, attr->prio, 0); @@ -698,7 +697,6 @@ __mlx5_eswitch_del_rule(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, if (fwd_rule) { mlx5_esw_vporttbl_put(esw, &fwd_attr); mlx5_chains_put_table(chains, attr->chain, attr->prio, 0); - esw_put_dest_tables_loop(esw, attr, 0, esw_attr->split_count); } else { if (split) mlx5_esw_vporttbl_put(esw, &fwd_attr);