On 2021/3/8 17:58, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 11:20:03AM +0800, Jing Xiangfeng wrote:
On 2021/3/7 23:24, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 04:09:28PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
On Thu, 2021-03-04 at 15:17 +0100, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 03:05:32PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
Hi Greg.
On Thu, 2021-03-04 at 14:46 +0100, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 03:33:12PM +0800, Jing Xiangfeng wrote: >> Using two distinct DMA zones turned out to be problematic. Here's an >> attempt go back to a saner default. > What problem does this solve? How does this fit into the stable kernel > rules? We changed the way we setup memory zones in arm64 in order to cater for Raspberry Pi 4's weird DMA constraints: ZONE_DMA spans the lower 1GB of memory and ZONE_DMA32 the rest of the 32bit address space. Since you can't allocate memory that crosses zone boundaries, this broke crashkernel allocations on big machines. This series fixes all this by parsing the HW description and checking for DMA constrained buses. When not found, the unnecessary zone creation is skipped.
What kernel/commit caused this "breakage"?
1a8e1cef7603 arm64: use both ZONE_DMA and ZONE_DMA32
Thanks for the info, all now queued up.
There is a fix in 5.11. Please consider applying the following commit to 5.10.y:
aed5041ef9a3 of: unittest: Fix build on architectures without CONFIG_OF_ADDRES
Thanks, now queued up.
Hi Grep, another commit d78050ee3544 "arm64: Remove arm64_dma32_phys_limit and its uses" should be involved, thanks.
"Prior to this patch, disabling CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32 leads to CMA allocation from the whole RAM as arm64_dma32_phys_limit becomes PHYS_MASK+1." from Catalin, see more from the link https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg867356.html
greg k-h .