4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Vignesh R vigneshr@ti.com
[ Upstream commit d087f15786021a9605b20f4c678312510be4cac1 ]
Register layout of a typical TPCC_EVT_MUX_M_N register is such that the lowest numbered event is at the lowest byte address and highest numbered event at highest byte address. But TPCC_EVT_MUX_60_63 register layout is different, in that the lowest numbered event is at the highest address and highest numbered event is at the lowest address. Therefore, modify ti_am335x_xbar_write() to handle TPCC_EVT_MUX_60_63 register accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Vignesh R vigneshr@ti.com Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfalusi@ti.com Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul vinod.koul@intel.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin alexander.levin@microsoft.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c +++ b/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c @@ -51,7 +51,15 @@ struct ti_am335x_xbar_map {
static inline void ti_am335x_xbar_write(void __iomem *iomem, int event, u8 val) { - writeb_relaxed(val, iomem + event); + /* + * TPCC_EVT_MUX_60_63 register layout is different than the + * rest, in the sense, that event 63 is mapped to lowest byte + * and event 60 is mapped to highest, handle it separately. + */ + if (event >= 60 && event <= 63) + writeb_relaxed(val, iomem + (63 - event % 4)); + else + writeb_relaxed(val, iomem + event); }
static void ti_am335x_xbar_free(struct device *dev, void *route_data)