From: Muchun Song songmuchun@bytedance.com
[ Upstream commit 23bc8f69f0eceecbb87c3801d2e48827d2dca92b ]
The pmd_leaf() is used to test a leaf mapped PMD, however, it misses the PROT_NONE mapped PMD on arm64. Fix it. A real world issue [1] caused by this was reported by Qian Cai. Also fix pud_leaf().
Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/comment/24798260/ [1] Fixes: 8aa82df3c123 ("arm64: mm: add p?d_leaf() definitions") Reported-by: Qian Cai quic_qiancai@quicinc.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song songmuchun@bytedance.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220422060033.48711-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Will Deacon will@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h index 94e147e5456c..dff2b483ea50 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h @@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ extern pgprot_t phys_mem_access_prot(struct file *file, unsigned long pfn, PMD_TYPE_TABLE) #define pmd_sect(pmd) ((pmd_val(pmd) & PMD_TYPE_MASK) == \ PMD_TYPE_SECT) -#define pmd_leaf(pmd) pmd_sect(pmd) +#define pmd_leaf(pmd) (pmd_present(pmd) && !pmd_table(pmd)) #define pmd_bad(pmd) (!pmd_table(pmd))
#define pmd_leaf_size(pmd) (pmd_cont(pmd) ? CONT_PMD_SIZE : PMD_SIZE) @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ static inline unsigned long pmd_page_vaddr(pmd_t pmd) #define pud_none(pud) (!pud_val(pud)) #define pud_bad(pud) (!pud_table(pud)) #define pud_present(pud) pte_present(pud_pte(pud)) -#define pud_leaf(pud) pud_sect(pud) +#define pud_leaf(pud) (pud_present(pud) && !pud_table(pud)) #define pud_valid(pud) pte_valid(pud_pte(pud))
static inline void set_pud(pud_t *pudp, pud_t pud)