4.16-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: NeilBrown neilb@suse.com
[ Upstream commit 17556cdbe6ed70a6a20e597b228628f7f34387f8 ]
Commit 8f18c8a48b73 ("staging: lustre: lmv: separate master object with master stripe") changed how lmo_root inodes were managed, particularly when LMV_HASH_FLAG_MIGRATION is not set. Previously lsm_md_oinfo[0].lmo_root was always a borrowed inode reference and didn't need to by iput(). Since the change, that special case only applies when LMV_HASH_FLAG_MIGRATION is set
In the upstream (lustre-release) version of this patch [Commit 60e07b972114 ("LU-4690 lod: separate master object with master stripe")] the for loop in the lmv_unpack_md() was changed to count from 0 and to ignore entry 0 if LMV_HASH_FLAG_MIGRATION is set. In the patch that got applied to Linux, that change was missing, so lsm_md_oinfo[0].lmo_root is never iput(). This results in a "VFS: Busy inodes" warning at unmount.
Fixes: 8f18c8a48b73 ("staging: lustre: lmv: separate master object with master stripe") Signed-off-by: NeilBrown neilb@suse.com Reviewed-by: James Simmons jsimmons@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin alexander.levin@microsoft.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lmv/lmv_obd.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lmv/lmv_obd.c +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lmv/lmv_obd.c @@ -2695,7 +2695,7 @@ static int lmv_unpackmd(struct obd_expor if (lsm && !lmm) { int i;
- for (i = 1; i < lsm->lsm_md_stripe_count; i++) { + for (i = 0; i < lsm->lsm_md_stripe_count; i++) { /* * For migrating inode, the master stripe and master * object will be the same, so do not need iput, see