3 Jan
2025
3 Jan
'25
6 p.m.
On Fri, 03 Jan 2025 17:39:39 +0000, Catalin Marinas catalin.marinas@arm.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 03, 2025 at 05:20:05PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Fri, Jan 03, 2025 at 02:26:35PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
@@ -3022,6 +3027,13 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_features[] = { .matches = match, \ } +#define HWCAP_CAP_MATCH_ID(match, reg, field, min_value, cap_type, cap) \
- { \
__HWCAP_CAP(#cap, cap_type, cap) \HWCAP_CPUID_MATCH(reg, field, min_value) \.matches = match, \- }
Do we actually need this macro?
Ignore me, we still need this macro as HWCAP_CAP_MATCH does not take all the arguments. Maybe not the read_scoped_sysreg() change though.
Ah, I just replied to your earlier email. Agreed on avoiding the read_scoped_sysreg() change, replacing it with system_supports_sve().
I'll respin the change now.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.