5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Luca Coelho luciano.coelho@intel.com
[ Upstream commit 8d4312e2b228ba7a5ac79154458098274ec61e9b ]
In newer hardware versions (i.e. display version >= 14), the second scaler doesn't support vertical scaling.
The current implementation of the scaling limits is simplified and only occurs when the planes are created, so we don't know which scaler is being used.
In order to handle separate scaling limits for horizontal and vertical scaling, and different limits per scaler, split the checks in two phases. We first do a simple check during plane creation and use the best-case scenario (because we don't know the scaler that may be used at a later point) and then do a more specific check when the scalers are actually being set up.
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho luciano.coelho@intel.com Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com Signed-off-by: Radhakrishna Sripada radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221223130509.43245-2-luciano... Stable-dep-of: c3070f080f9b ("drm/i915: Fix intel_atomic_setup_scalers() plane_state handling") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic.c index b4e7ac51aa31d..4b4514ce6d88b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic.c @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ #include "intel_global_state.h" #include "intel_hdcp.h" #include "intel_psr.h" +#include "intel_fb.h" #include "skl_universal_plane.h"
/** @@ -310,11 +311,11 @@ intel_crtc_destroy_state(struct drm_crtc *crtc, kfree(crtc_state); }
-static void intel_atomic_setup_scaler(struct intel_crtc_scaler_state *scaler_state, - int num_scalers_need, struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc, - const char *name, int idx, - struct intel_plane_state *plane_state, - int *scaler_id) +static int intel_atomic_setup_scaler(struct intel_crtc_scaler_state *scaler_state, + int num_scalers_need, struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc, + const char *name, int idx, + struct intel_plane_state *plane_state, + int *scaler_id) { struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(intel_crtc->base.dev); int j; @@ -334,7 +335,7 @@ static void intel_atomic_setup_scaler(struct intel_crtc_scaler_state *scaler_sta
if (drm_WARN(&dev_priv->drm, *scaler_id < 0, "Cannot find scaler for %s:%d\n", name, idx)) - return; + return -EINVAL;
/* set scaler mode */ if (plane_state && plane_state->hw.fb && @@ -375,9 +376,71 @@ static void intel_atomic_setup_scaler(struct intel_crtc_scaler_state *scaler_sta mode = SKL_PS_SCALER_MODE_DYN; }
+ /* + * FIXME: we should also check the scaler factors for pfit, so + * this shouldn't be tied directly to planes. + */ + if (plane_state && plane_state->hw.fb) { + const struct drm_framebuffer *fb = plane_state->hw.fb; + const struct drm_rect *src = &plane_state->uapi.src; + const struct drm_rect *dst = &plane_state->uapi.dst; + int hscale, vscale, max_vscale, max_hscale; + + /* + * FIXME: When two scalers are needed, but only one of + * them needs to downscale, we should make sure that + * the one that needs downscaling support is assigned + * as the first scaler, so we don't reject downscaling + * unnecessarily. + */ + + if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 14) { + /* + * On versions 14 and up, only the first + * scaler supports a vertical scaling factor + * of more than 1.0, while a horizontal + * scaling factor of 3.0 is supported. + */ + max_hscale = 0x30000 - 1; + if (*scaler_id == 0) + max_vscale = 0x30000 - 1; + else + max_vscale = 0x10000; + + } else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10 || + !intel_format_info_is_yuv_semiplanar(fb->format, fb->modifier)) { + max_hscale = 0x30000 - 1; + max_vscale = 0x30000 - 1; + } else { + max_hscale = 0x20000 - 1; + max_vscale = 0x20000 - 1; + } + + /* + * FIXME: We should change the if-else block above to + * support HQ vs dynamic scaler properly. + */ + + /* Check if required scaling is within limits */ + hscale = drm_rect_calc_hscale(src, dst, 1, max_hscale); + vscale = drm_rect_calc_vscale(src, dst, 1, max_vscale); + + if (hscale < 0 || vscale < 0) { + drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, + "Scaler %d doesn't support required plane scaling\n", + *scaler_id); + drm_rect_debug_print("src: ", src, true); + drm_rect_debug_print("dst: ", dst, false); + + return -EINVAL; + } + } + drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "Attached scaler id %u.%u to %s:%d\n", intel_crtc->pipe, *scaler_id, name, idx); scaler_state->scalers[*scaler_id].mode = mode; + + return 0; }
/** @@ -437,7 +500,7 @@ int intel_atomic_setup_scalers(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, for (i = 0; i < sizeof(scaler_state->scaler_users) * 8; i++) { int *scaler_id; const char *name; - int idx; + int idx, ret;
/* skip if scaler not required */ if (!(scaler_state->scaler_users & (1 << i))) @@ -494,9 +557,11 @@ int intel_atomic_setup_scalers(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, scaler_id = &plane_state->scaler_id; }
- intel_atomic_setup_scaler(scaler_state, num_scalers_need, - intel_crtc, name, idx, - plane_state, scaler_id); + ret = intel_atomic_setup_scaler(scaler_state, num_scalers_need, + intel_crtc, name, idx, + plane_state, scaler_id); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; }
return 0;