4.16-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Alexei Starovoitov ast@kernel.org
commit af86ca4e3088fe5eacf2f7e58c01fa68ca067672 upstream
Detect code patterns where malicious 'speculative store bypass' can be used and sanitize such patterns.
39: (bf) r3 = r10 40: (07) r3 += -216 41: (79) r8 = *(u64 *)(r7 +0) // slow read 42: (7a) *(u64 *)(r10 -72) = 0 // verifier inserts this instruction 43: (7b) *(u64 *)(r8 +0) = r3 // this store becomes slow due to r8 44: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r6 +0) // cpu speculatively executes this load 45: (71) r2 = *(u8 *)(r1 +0) // speculatively arbitrary 'load byte' // is now sanitized
Above code after x86 JIT becomes: e5: mov %rbp,%rdx e8: add $0xffffffffffffff28,%rdx ef: mov 0x0(%r13),%r14 f3: movq $0x0,-0x48(%rbp) fb: mov %rdx,0x0(%r14) ff: mov 0x0(%rbx),%rdi 103: movzbq 0x0(%rdi),%rsi
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov ast@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 1 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h @@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ struct bpf_insn_aux_data { s32 call_imm; /* saved imm field of call insn */ }; int ctx_field_size; /* the ctx field size for load insn, maybe 0 */ + int sanitize_stack_off; /* stack slot to be cleared */ bool seen; /* this insn was processed by the verifier */ };
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -970,7 +970,7 @@ static bool register_is_null(struct bpf_ */ static int check_stack_write(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_func_state *state, /* func where register points to */ - int off, int size, int value_regno) + int off, int size, int value_regno, int insn_idx) { struct bpf_func_state *cur; /* state of the current function */ int i, slot = -off - 1, spi = slot / BPF_REG_SIZE, err; @@ -1009,8 +1009,33 @@ static int check_stack_write(struct bpf_ state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr = cur->regs[value_regno]; state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.live |= REG_LIVE_WRITTEN;
- for (i = 0; i < BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) + for (i = 0; i < BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) { + if (state->stack[spi].slot_type[i] == STACK_MISC && + !env->allow_ptr_leaks) { + int *poff = &env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].sanitize_stack_off; + int soff = (-spi - 1) * BPF_REG_SIZE; + + /* detected reuse of integer stack slot with a pointer + * which means either llvm is reusing stack slot or + * an attacker is trying to exploit CVE-2018-3639 + * (speculative store bypass) + * Have to sanitize that slot with preemptive + * store of zero. + */ + if (*poff && *poff != soff) { + /* disallow programs where single insn stores + * into two different stack slots, since verifier + * cannot sanitize them + */ + verbose(env, + "insn %d cannot access two stack slots fp%d and fp%d", + insn_idx, *poff, soff); + return -EINVAL; + } + *poff = soff; + } state->stack[spi].slot_type[i] = STACK_SPILL; + } } else { u8 type = STACK_MISC;
@@ -1685,7 +1710,7 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_v
if (t == BPF_WRITE) err = check_stack_write(env, state, off, size, - value_regno); + value_regno, insn_idx); else err = check_stack_read(env, state, off, size, value_regno); @@ -5156,6 +5181,34 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct b else continue;
+ if (type == BPF_WRITE && + env->insn_aux_data[i + delta].sanitize_stack_off) { + struct bpf_insn patch[] = { + /* Sanitize suspicious stack slot with zero. + * There are no memory dependencies for this store, + * since it's only using frame pointer and immediate + * constant of zero + */ + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, + env->insn_aux_data[i + delta].sanitize_stack_off, + 0), + /* the original STX instruction will immediately + * overwrite the same stack slot with appropriate value + */ + *insn, + }; + + cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(patch); + new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, patch, cnt); + if (!new_prog) + return -ENOMEM; + + delta += cnt - 1; + env->prog = new_prog; + insn = new_prog->insnsi + i + delta; + continue; + } + if (env->insn_aux_data[i + delta].ptr_type != PTR_TO_CTX) continue;