On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 11:12:27AM -0700, Souza, Jose wrote:
On Thu, 2018-04-05 at 12:49 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
Inside the psr work function, we want to wait for PSR to idle first and wish to do so without blocking the normal modeset path, so we do so without holding the PSR lock. However, we first have to find which pipe PSR was enabled on, which requires chasing into the PSR struct and requires locking to prevent intel_psr_disable() from concurrently setting our pointer to NULL.
Fixes: 995d30477496 ("drm/i915: VLV/CHV PSR Software timer mode") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Cc: Durgadoss R durgadoss.r@intel.com Cc: Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.vivi@intel.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.0+
Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jose Roberto de Souza jose.souza@intel.com
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c index 2d53f7398a6d..69a5b276f4d8 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c @@ -775,53 +775,59 @@ void intel_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev_priv->psr.work); } -static void intel_psr_work(struct work_struct *work) +static bool psr_wait_for_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) {
- struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv =
container_of(work, typeof(*dev_priv),psr.work.work);
- struct intel_dp *intel_dp = dev_priv->psr.enabled;
- struct drm_crtc *crtc = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)-
base.base.crtc;
- enum pipe pipe = to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe;
- struct intel_dp *intel_dp;
nitpick: Why not already set it? struct intel_dp *intel_dp = dev_priv->psr.enabled;
- i915_reg_t reg;
- u32 mask;
- int err;
- intel_dp = dev_priv->psr.enabled;
- if (!intel_dp)
return false;
- /* We have to make sure PSR is ready for re-enable
* otherwise it keeps disabled until next fullenable/disable cycle.
* PSR might take some time to get fully disabled* and be ready for re-enable.*/nitpick: While on that you could replace this for:
if (!(IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))) {
if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled) {
if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv,EDP_PSR2_STATUS,EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK,
0,50)) {DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting forPSR2 Idle for re-enable\n");
return;}
reg = EDP_PSR2_STATUS;mask = EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK;
if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv,EDP_PSR_STATUS,EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK,
0,50)) {DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for PSRIdle for re-enable\n");
return;}
reg = EDP_PSR_STATUS;mask = EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK;
if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv,VLV_PSRSTAT(pipe),VLV_EDP_PSR_IN_TRANS,0,1)) {DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for PSR Idlefor re-enable\n");
return;}
struct drm_crtc *crtc =dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base.base.crtc;
I'm afraid that the issue is this pointer here. So this will only mask the issue.
Should we maybe stash the pipe? :/
enum pipe pipe = to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe;reg = VLV_PSRSTAT(pipe);mask = VLV_EDP_PSR_IN_TRANS;- mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
- err = intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv, reg, mask, 0, 50);
- if (err)
DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for PSR Idle for re-enable\n");
- /* After the unlocked wait, verify that PSR is still wanted!
*/ mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
- intel_dp = dev_priv->psr.enabled;
- return err == 0 && dev_priv->psr.enabled;
+}
- if (!intel_dp)
+static void intel_psr_work(struct work_struct *work) +{
- struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv =
container_of(work, typeof(*dev_priv),psr.work.work);
- mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
- /*
* We have to make sure PSR is ready for re-enable* otherwise it keeps disabled until next fullenable/disable cycle.
* PSR might take some time to get fully disabled* and be ready for re-enable.*/- if (!psr_wait_for_idle(dev_priv)) goto unlock;
/* @@ -832,7 +838,7 @@ static void intel_psr_work(struct work_struct *work) if (dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits) goto unlock;
- intel_psr_activate(intel_dp);
- intel_psr_activate(dev_priv->psr.enabled);
unlock: mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock); }