5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Tuo Li islituo@gmail.com
commit 0e881c0a4b6146b7e856735226208f48251facd8 upstream.
The variable phba->fcf.fcf_flag is often protected by the lock phba->hbalock() when is accessed. Here is an example in lpfc_unregister_fcf_rescan():
spin_lock_irq(&phba->hbalock); phba->fcf.fcf_flag |= FCF_INIT_DISC; spin_unlock_irq(&phba->hbalock);
However, in the same function, phba->fcf.fcf_flag is assigned with 0 without holding the lock, and thus can cause a data race:
phba->fcf.fcf_flag = 0;
To fix this possible data race, a lock and unlock pair is added when accessing the variable phba->fcf.fcf_flag.
Reported-by: BassCheck bass@buaa.edu.cn Signed-off-by: Tuo Li islituo@gmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230630024748.1035993-1-islituo@gmail.com Reviewed-by: Justin Tee justin.tee@broadcom.com Reviewed-by: Laurence Oberman loberman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen martin.petersen@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Bin Lan bin.lan.cn@windriver.com Signed-off-by: He Zhe zhe.he@windriver.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c @@ -6790,7 +6790,9 @@ lpfc_unregister_fcf_rescan(struct lpfc_h if (rc) return; /* Reset HBA FCF states after successful unregister FCF */ + spin_lock_irq(&phba->hbalock); phba->fcf.fcf_flag = 0; + spin_unlock_irq(&phba->hbalock); phba->fcf.current_rec.flag = 0;
/*