The patch below does not apply to the 6.0-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
Possible dependencies:
95bc35f9bee5 ("mm/damon/sysfs: fix wrong empty schemes assumption under online tuning in damon_sysfs_set_schemes()")
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 95bc35f9bee5220dad4e8567654ab3288a181639 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: SeongJae Park sj@kernel.org Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 19:48:31 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] mm/damon/sysfs: fix wrong empty schemes assumption under online tuning in damon_sysfs_set_schemes()
Commit da87878010e5 ("mm/damon/sysfs: support online inputs update") made 'damon_sysfs_set_schemes()' to be called for running DAMON context, which could have schemes. In the case, DAMON sysfs interface is supposed to update, remove, or add schemes to reflect the sysfs files. However, the code is assuming the DAMON context wouldn't have schemes at all, and therefore creates and adds new schemes. As a result, the code doesn't work as intended for online schemes tuning and could have more than expected memory footprint. The schemes are all in the DAMON context, so it doesn't leak the memory, though.
Remove the wrong asssumption (the DAMON context wouldn't have schemes) in 'damon_sysfs_set_schemes()' to fix the bug.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221122194831.3472-1-sj@kernel.org Fixes: da87878010e5 ("mm/damon/sysfs: support online inputs update") Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park sj@kernel.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [5.19+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org
diff --git a/mm/damon/sysfs.c b/mm/damon/sysfs.c index 5ce403378c20..07e5f1bdf025 100644 --- a/mm/damon/sysfs.c +++ b/mm/damon/sysfs.c @@ -2283,12 +2283,54 @@ static struct damos *damon_sysfs_mk_scheme( &wmarks); }
+static void damon_sysfs_update_scheme(struct damos *scheme, + struct damon_sysfs_scheme *sysfs_scheme) +{ + struct damon_sysfs_access_pattern *access_pattern = + sysfs_scheme->access_pattern; + struct damon_sysfs_quotas *sysfs_quotas = sysfs_scheme->quotas; + struct damon_sysfs_weights *sysfs_weights = sysfs_quotas->weights; + struct damon_sysfs_watermarks *sysfs_wmarks = sysfs_scheme->watermarks; + + scheme->pattern.min_sz_region = access_pattern->sz->min; + scheme->pattern.max_sz_region = access_pattern->sz->max; + scheme->pattern.min_nr_accesses = access_pattern->nr_accesses->min; + scheme->pattern.max_nr_accesses = access_pattern->nr_accesses->max; + scheme->pattern.min_age_region = access_pattern->age->min; + scheme->pattern.max_age_region = access_pattern->age->max; + + scheme->action = sysfs_scheme->action; + + scheme->quota.ms = sysfs_quotas->ms; + scheme->quota.sz = sysfs_quotas->sz; + scheme->quota.reset_interval = sysfs_quotas->reset_interval_ms; + scheme->quota.weight_sz = sysfs_weights->sz; + scheme->quota.weight_nr_accesses = sysfs_weights->nr_accesses; + scheme->quota.weight_age = sysfs_weights->age; + + scheme->wmarks.metric = sysfs_wmarks->metric; + scheme->wmarks.interval = sysfs_wmarks->interval_us; + scheme->wmarks.high = sysfs_wmarks->high; + scheme->wmarks.mid = sysfs_wmarks->mid; + scheme->wmarks.low = sysfs_wmarks->low; +} + static int damon_sysfs_set_schemes(struct damon_ctx *ctx, struct damon_sysfs_schemes *sysfs_schemes) { - int i; + struct damos *scheme, *next; + int i = 0; + + damon_for_each_scheme_safe(scheme, next, ctx) { + if (i < sysfs_schemes->nr) + damon_sysfs_update_scheme(scheme, + sysfs_schemes->schemes_arr[i]); + else + damon_destroy_scheme(scheme); + i++; + }
- for (i = 0; i < sysfs_schemes->nr; i++) { + for (; i < sysfs_schemes->nr; i++) { struct damos *scheme, *next;
scheme = damon_sysfs_mk_scheme(sysfs_schemes->schemes_arr[i]);