On 10/29/25 16:37, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 04:11:33PM +0200, Claudiu wrote:
From: Claudiu Beznea claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com
Since snd_soc_suspend() is invoked through snd_soc_pm_ops->suspend(), and snd_soc_pm_ops is associated with the soc_driver (defined in sound/soc/soc-core.c), and there is no parent-child relationship between the soc_driver and the DA7213 codec driver, the power management subsystem does not enforce a specific suspend/resume order between the DA7213 driver and the soc_driver.
Oh, also:
Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the subsystem, this makes it easier for people to identify relevant patches. Look at what existing commits in the area you're changing are doing and make sure your subject lines visually resemble what they're doing. There's no need to resubmit to fix this alone.
I messed this up. I'll be more careful next time.
Thank you, Claudiu