From: Shree Ramamoorthy s-ramamoorthy@ti.com
[ Upstream commit 76b58d5111fdcffce615beb71520bc7a6f1742c9 ]
The chipid macro/variable and regmap_read function call is not needed because the TPS65219_REG_TI_DEV_ID register value is not a consistent value across TPS65219 PMIC config versions. Reading from the DEV_ID register without a consistent value to compare it to isn't useful. There isn't a way to verify the match data ID is the same ID read from the DEV_ID device register. 0xF0 isn't a DEV_ID value consistent across TPS65219 NVM configurations.
For TPS65215, there is a consistent value in bits 5-0 of the DEV_ID register. However, there are other error checks in place within probe() that apply to both PMICs rather than keeping this isolated check for one PMIC.
Signed-off-by: Shree Ramamoorthy s-ramamoorthy@ti.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250206173725.386720-4-s-ramamoorthy@ti.com Signed-off-by: Lee Jones lee@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/mfd/tps65219.c | 7 ------- 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c b/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c index 57ff5cb294a66..d3b77abec786e 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c +++ b/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c @@ -228,7 +228,6 @@ static const struct regmap_irq_chip tps65219_irq_chip = { static int tps65219_probe(struct i2c_client *client) { struct tps65219 *tps; - unsigned int chipid; bool pwr_button; int ret;
@@ -253,12 +252,6 @@ static int tps65219_probe(struct i2c_client *client) if (ret) return ret;
- ret = regmap_read(tps->regmap, TPS65219_REG_TI_DEV_ID, &chipid); - if (ret) { - dev_err(tps->dev, "Failed to read device ID: %d\n", ret); - return ret; - } - ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(tps->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO, tps65219_cells, ARRAY_SIZE(tps65219_cells), NULL, 0, regmap_irq_get_domain(tps->irq_data));