From: Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net
commit e042aa532c84d18ff13291d00620502ce7a38dda upstream.
In 7fedb63a8307 ("bpf: Tighten speculative pointer arithmetic mask") we narrowed the offset mask for unprivileged pointer arithmetic in order to mitigate a corner case where in the speculative domain it is possible to advance, for example, the map value pointer by up to value_size-1 out-of- bounds in order to leak kernel memory via side-channel to user space.
The verifier's state pruning for scalars leaves one corner case open where in the first verification path R_x holds an unknown scalar with an aux->alu_limit of e.g. 7, and in a second verification path that same register R_x, here denoted as R_x', holds an unknown scalar which has tighter bounds and would thus satisfy range_within(R_x, R_x') as well as tnum_in(R_x, R_x') for state pruning, yielding an aux->alu_limit of 3: Given the second path fits the register constraints for pruning, the final generated mask from aux->alu_limit will remain at 7. While technically not wrong for the non-speculative domain, it would however be possible to craft similar cases where the mask would be too wide as in 7fedb63a8307.
One way to fix it is to detect the presence of unknown scalar map pointer arithmetic and force a deeper search on unknown scalars to ensure that we do not run into a masking mismatch.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov ast@kernel.org [OP: adjusted context for 4.19] Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait ovidiu.panait@windriver.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 1 + kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++---------- 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h @@ -215,6 +215,7 @@ struct bpf_verifier_env { struct bpf_map *used_maps[MAX_USED_MAPS]; /* array of map's used by eBPF program */ u32 used_map_cnt; /* number of used maps */ u32 id_gen; /* used to generate unique reg IDs */ + bool explore_alu_limits; bool allow_ptr_leaks; bool seen_direct_write; struct bpf_insn_aux_data *insn_aux_data; /* array of per-insn state */ --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -2871,6 +2871,12 @@ static int sanitize_ptr_alu(struct bpf_v alu_state |= off_is_imm ? BPF_ALU_IMMEDIATE : 0; alu_state |= ptr_is_dst_reg ? BPF_ALU_SANITIZE_SRC : BPF_ALU_SANITIZE_DST; + + /* Limit pruning on unknown scalars to enable deep search for + * potential masking differences from other program paths. + */ + if (!off_is_imm) + env->explore_alu_limits = true; }
err = update_alu_sanitation_state(aux, alu_state, alu_limit); @@ -4813,8 +4819,8 @@ static bool check_ids(u32 old_id, u32 cu }
/* Returns true if (rold safe implies rcur safe) */ -static bool regsafe(struct bpf_reg_state *rold, struct bpf_reg_state *rcur, - struct bpf_id_pair *idmap) +static bool regsafe(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *rold, + struct bpf_reg_state *rcur, struct bpf_id_pair *idmap) { bool equal;
@@ -4840,6 +4846,8 @@ static bool regsafe(struct bpf_reg_state return false; switch (rold->type) { case SCALAR_VALUE: + if (env->explore_alu_limits) + return false; if (rcur->type == SCALAR_VALUE) { /* new val must satisfy old val knowledge */ return range_within(rold, rcur) && @@ -4916,9 +4924,8 @@ static bool regsafe(struct bpf_reg_state return false; }
-static bool stacksafe(struct bpf_func_state *old, - struct bpf_func_state *cur, - struct bpf_id_pair *idmap) +static bool stacksafe(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_func_state *old, + struct bpf_func_state *cur, struct bpf_id_pair *idmap) { int i, spi;
@@ -4960,9 +4967,8 @@ static bool stacksafe(struct bpf_func_st continue; if (old->stack[spi].slot_type[0] != STACK_SPILL) continue; - if (!regsafe(&old->stack[spi].spilled_ptr, - &cur->stack[spi].spilled_ptr, - idmap)) + if (!regsafe(env, &old->stack[spi].spilled_ptr, + &cur->stack[spi].spilled_ptr, idmap)) /* when explored and current stack slot are both storing * spilled registers, check that stored pointers types * are the same as well. @@ -5011,10 +5017,11 @@ static bool func_states_equal(struct bpf
memset(env->idmap_scratch, 0, sizeof(env->idmap_scratch)); for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++) - if (!regsafe(&old->regs[i], &cur->regs[i], env->idmap_scratch)) + if (!regsafe(env, &old->regs[i], &cur->regs[i], + env->idmap_scratch)) return false;
- if (!stacksafe(old, cur, env->idmap_scratch)) + if (!stacksafe(env, old, cur, env->idmap_scratch)) return false;
return true;