From: Josef Bacik josef@toxicpanda.com
commit a48b73eca4ceb9b8a4b97f290a065335dbcd8a04 upstream.
With the conversion of the tree locks to rwsem I got the following lockdep splat:
====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.8.0-rc7-00165-g04ec4da5f45f-dirty #922 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ compsize/11122 is trying to acquire lock: ffff889fabca8768 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
but task is already holding lock: ffff889fe720fe40 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}: down_write_nested+0x3b/0x70 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x120 btrfs_search_slot+0x756/0x990 btrfs_lookup_inode+0x3a/0xb4 __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x93/0x270 btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x168/0x230 btrfs_work_helper+0xd4/0x570 process_one_work+0x2ad/0x5f0 worker_thread+0x3a/0x3d0 kthread+0x133/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
-> #1 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 btrfs_delayed_update_inode+0x50/0x440 btrfs_update_inode+0x8a/0xf0 btrfs_dirty_inode+0x5b/0xd0 touch_atime+0xa1/0xd0 btrfs_file_mmap+0x3f/0x60 mmap_region+0x3a4/0x640 do_mmap+0x376/0x580 vm_mmap_pgoff+0xd5/0x120 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x193/0x230 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
-> #0 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360 __might_fault+0x68/0x90 _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80 copy_to_sk.isra.32+0x121/0x300 search_ioctl+0x106/0x200 btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2+0x7b/0xf0 btrfs_ioctl+0x106f/0x30a0 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of: &mm->mmap_lock#2 --> &delayed_node->mutex --> btrfs-fs-00
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(btrfs-fs-00); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); lock(btrfs-fs-00); lock(&mm->mmap_lock#2);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by compsize/11122: #0: ffff889fe720fe40 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
stack backtrace: CPU: 17 PID: 11122 Comm: compsize Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.8.0-rc7-00165-g04ec4da5f45f-dirty #922 Hardware name: Quanta Tioga Pass Single Side 01-0030993006/Tioga Pass Single Side, BIOS F08_3A18 12/20/2018 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x78/0xa0 check_noncircular+0x165/0x180 __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360 ? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90 ? find_held_lock+0x72/0x90 __might_fault+0x68/0x90 ? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90 _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80 copy_to_sk.isra.32+0x121/0x300 ? btrfs_search_forward+0x2a6/0x360 search_ioctl+0x106/0x200 btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2+0x7b/0xf0 btrfs_ioctl+0x106f/0x30a0 ? __do_sys_newfstat+0x5a/0x70 ? ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
The problem is we're doing a copy_to_user() while holding tree locks, which can deadlock if we have to do a page fault for the copy_to_user(). This exists even without my locking changes, so it needs to be fixed. Rework the search ioctl to do the pre-fault and then copy_to_user_nofault for the copying.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana fdmanana@suse.com Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik josef@toxicpanda.com Reviewed-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
--- fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 8 ++++---- fs/btrfs/extent_io.h | 6 +++--- fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++------- 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c @@ -5640,9 +5640,9 @@ void read_extent_buffer(const struct ext } }
-int read_extent_buffer_to_user(const struct extent_buffer *eb, - void __user *dstv, - unsigned long start, unsigned long len) +int read_extent_buffer_to_user_nofault(const struct extent_buffer *eb, + void __user *dstv, + unsigned long start, unsigned long len) { size_t cur; size_t offset; @@ -5662,7 +5662,7 @@ int read_extent_buffer_to_user(const str
cur = min(len, (PAGE_SIZE - offset)); kaddr = page_address(page); - if (copy_to_user(dst, kaddr + offset, cur)) { + if (copy_to_user_nofault(dst, kaddr + offset, cur)) { ret = -EFAULT; break; } --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h @@ -241,9 +241,9 @@ int memcmp_extent_buffer(const struct ex void read_extent_buffer(const struct extent_buffer *eb, void *dst, unsigned long start, unsigned long len); -int read_extent_buffer_to_user(const struct extent_buffer *eb, - void __user *dst, unsigned long start, - unsigned long len); +int read_extent_buffer_to_user_nofault(const struct extent_buffer *eb, + void __user *dst, unsigned long start, + unsigned long len); void write_extent_buffer_fsid(const struct extent_buffer *eb, const void *src); void write_extent_buffer_chunk_tree_uuid(const struct extent_buffer *eb, const void *src); --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c @@ -2086,9 +2086,14 @@ static noinline int copy_to_sk(struct bt sh.len = item_len; sh.transid = found_transid;
- /* copy search result header */ - if (copy_to_user(ubuf + *sk_offset, &sh, sizeof(sh))) { - ret = -EFAULT; + /* + * Copy search result header. If we fault then loop again so we + * can fault in the pages and -EFAULT there if there's a + * problem. Otherwise we'll fault and then copy the buffer in + * properly this next time through + */ + if (copy_to_user_nofault(ubuf + *sk_offset, &sh, sizeof(sh))) { + ret = 0; goto out; }
@@ -2096,10 +2101,14 @@ static noinline int copy_to_sk(struct bt
if (item_len) { char __user *up = ubuf + *sk_offset; - /* copy the item */ - if (read_extent_buffer_to_user(leaf, up, - item_off, item_len)) { - ret = -EFAULT; + /* + * Copy the item, same behavior as above, but reset the + * * sk_offset so we copy the full thing again. + */ + if (read_extent_buffer_to_user_nofault(leaf, up, + item_off, item_len)) { + ret = 0; + *sk_offset -= sizeof(sh); goto out; }
@@ -2184,6 +2193,10 @@ static noinline int search_ioctl(struct key.offset = sk->min_offset;
while (1) { + ret = fault_in_pages_writeable(ubuf, *buf_size - sk_offset); + if (ret) + break; + ret = btrfs_search_forward(root, &key, path, sk->min_transid); if (ret != 0) { if (ret > 0)