Hi Sasha,
There is a fix patch for this patch:
13ab183 mm/kmemleak.c: make cond_resched() rate-limiting more efficient
So if this patch is backported to stable, maybe the above patch is also need to be backported too.
Thanks Yisheng
On 2018/1/24 12:15, Sasha Levin wrote:
From: Yisheng Xie xieyisheng1@huawei.com
[ Upstream commit bde5f6bc68db51128f875a756e9082a6c6ff7b4c ]
kmemleak_scan() will scan struct page for each node and it can be really large and resulting in a soft lockup. We have seen a soft lockup when do scan while compile kernel:
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#53 stuck for 22s! [bash:10287] [...] Call Trace: kmemleak_scan+0x21a/0x4c0 kmemleak_write+0x312/0x350 full_proxy_write+0x5a/0xa0 __vfs_write+0x33/0x150 vfs_write+0xad/0x1a0 SyS_write+0x52/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x61/0x1a0 entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
Fix this by adding cond_resched every MAX_SCAN_SIZE.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1511439788-20099-1-git-send-email-xieyisheng1@huawe... Signed-off-by: Yisheng Xie xieyisheng1@huawei.com Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas catalin.marinas@arm.com Acked-by: Catalin Marinas catalin.marinas@arm.com Cc: Michal Hocko mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin alexander.levin@microsoft.com
mm/kmemleak.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/kmemleak.c b/mm/kmemleak.c index 7780cd83a495..a1ba553816eb 100644 --- a/mm/kmemleak.c +++ b/mm/kmemleak.c @@ -1532,6 +1532,8 @@ static void kmemleak_scan(void) if (page_count(page) == 0) continue; scan_block(page, page + 1, NULL);
if (!(pfn % (MAX_SCAN_SIZE / sizeof(*page))))
} } put_online_mems();cond_resched();