On Wed Sep 10, 2025 at 6:57 PM CEST, Théo Lebrun wrote:
Hello Nicolas, Jakub, Stanimir,
On Tue Aug 26, 2025 at 11:14 AM CEST, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
On 26/08/2025 at 01:53, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 12:34:36 +0300 Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
In case of rx queue reset and 64bit capable hardware, set the upper 32bits of DMA ring buffer address.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.6+ Fixes: 9ba723b081a2 ("net: macb: remove BUG_ON() and reset the queue to handle RX errors") Credits-to: Phil Elwell phil@raspberrypi.com Credits-to: Jonathan Bell jonathan@raspberrypi.com Signed-off-by: Stanimir Varbanov svarbanov@suse.de Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn andrew@lunn.ch
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c index ce95fad8cedd..36717e7e5811 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c @@ -1634,7 +1634,11 @@ static int macb_rx(struct macb_queue *queue, struct napi_struct *napi, macb_writel(bp, NCR, ctrl & ~MACB_BIT(RE));
macb_init_rx_ring(queue);
queue_writel(queue, RBQP, queue->rx_ring_dma);
queue_writel(queue, RBQP, lower_32_bits(queue->rx_ring_dma));
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT
if (bp->hw_dma_cap & HW_DMA_CAP_64B)
macb_writel(bp, RBQPH, upper_32_bits(queue->rx_ring_dma));
+#endif
macb_writel(bp, NCR, ctrl | MACB_BIT(RE));
Looks like a subset of Théo Lebrun's work: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250820-macb-fixes-v4-0-23c399429164@bootlin.co... let's wait for his patches to get merged instead?
Yes, we can certainly wait. As RBOPH changes by Théo are key, they will probably remove the need for this fix altogether: but I count on you Stanimir to monitor that (as I don't have a 64 bit capable platform at hand).
I when looking for where this patch came from. Commit in the raspberrypi downstream kernel: https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/commit/e45c98decbb16e58a79c7ec6fbe43743...
It is somewhat unreadable; the only part that seems related is the:
net: macb: Several patches for RP1 64-bit RX fix
Is there any MACB hardware (not GEM) that uses 64-bit DMA descriptors? What platforms? RPi maybe?
Assuming such a platform exists, the next question is why does macb_rx() need to reinit RBQPH/0x04D4. It reinits RBQP/0x0018 because it is the buffer pointer and increments as buffers get used.
To reinit RBQPH would be for the case of the increment overflowing into the upper 32-bits. Sounds like a reasonable fix (for a really rare bug) if that hardware actually exists.
This wouldn't be needed on GEM because RBQPH is shared across queues. So of course RBQPH would not increment with the buffer pointer.
If this patch is needed (does HW exist?), then my series doesn't address it. I can take the patch in a potential V6 if you want. V5 got posted today [0].
Coming back after some sleep: my series does address this. It updates macb_alloc_consistent() so allocs look like:
size = bp->num_queues * macb_tx_ring_size_per_queue(bp); tx = dma_alloc_coherent(dev, size, &tx_dma, GFP_KERNEL); if (!tx || upper_32_bits(tx_dma) != upper_32_bits(tx_dma + size - 1)) goto out_err;
// same for rx
In the MACB (!GEM) case, bp->num_queues=1 so we will check that the start and end of the DMA descriptor ring buffer have the same upper 32-bits.
That implies macb_rx() doesn't have to reinit RBQPH/0x04D4.
Thanks,
-- Théo Lebrun, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com