On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 04:35:40PM +0300, Sergey Shtylyov wrote:
On 4/5/21 11:53 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
From: Sergey Shtylyov s.shtylyov@omprussia.ru
[ Upstream commit 705e9195187d85249fbb0eaa844b1604a98fbc9a ]
The 'reason' variable in module_sig_check() points to 3 strings across the *switch* statement, all needlessly starting with the same text. Let's put the starting text into the pr_notice() call -- it saves 21 bytes of the object code (x86 gcc 10.2.1).
Suggested-by: Joe Perches joe@perches.com Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes mbenes@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov s.shtylyov@omprussia.ru Signed-off-by: Jessica Yu jeyu@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org
kernel/module.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c index ab1f97cfe18d..9fe3e9b85348 100644 --- a/kernel/module.c +++ b/kernel/module.c @@ -2908,16 +2908,17 @@ static int module_sig_check(struct load_info *info, int flags) * enforcing, certain errors are non-fatal. */ case -ENODATA:
reason = "Loading of unsigned module";
goto decide; case -ENOPKG:reason = "unsigned module";
reason = "Loading of module with unsupported crypto";
goto decide; case -ENOKEY:reason = "module with unsupported crypto";
reason = "Loading of module with unavailable key";
decide: if (is_module_sig_enforced()) {reason = "module with unavailable key";
pr_notice("%s is rejected\n", reason);
pr_notice("%s: loading of %s is rejected\n",
info->name, reason);
Mhm, in 5.4 there was no printing of 'info->name'...
Is that now a problem?
thanks,
greg k-h