On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 2:13 AM Greg KH gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 10:16:49PM +0800, guoren@kernel.org wrote:
From: Guo Ren guoren@linux.alibaba.com
These patch_text implementations are using stop_machine_cpuslocked infrastructure with atomic cpu_count. The original idea: When the master CPU patch_text, the others should wait for it. But current implementation is using the first CPU as master, which couldn't guarantee the remaining CPUs are waiting. This patch changes the last CPU as the master to solve the potential risk.
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren guoren@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Guo Ren guoren@kernel.org Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt palmer@rivosinc.com Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu mhiramat@kernel.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
What commit id does this change fix?
Thx for pointing this out, I would follow the rule to add Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org.