6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Yonglong Liu liuyonglong@huawei.com
[ Upstream commit ac92c0a9a0603fb448e60f38e63302e4eebb8035 ]
In hclgevf_mbx_handler() and hclgevf_get_mbx_resp() functions, there is a typical store-store and load-load scenario between received_resp and additional_info. This patch adds barrier to fix the problem.
Fixes: 4671042f1ef0 ("net: hns3: add match_id to check mailbox response from PF to VF") Signed-off-by: Yonglong Liu liuyonglong@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Jijie Shao shaojijie@huawei.com Signed-off-by: David S. Miller davem@davemloft.net Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3vf/hclgevf_mbx.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3vf/hclgevf_mbx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3vf/hclgevf_mbx.c index bbf7b14079de3..85c2a634c8f96 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3vf/hclgevf_mbx.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3vf/hclgevf_mbx.c @@ -63,6 +63,9 @@ static int hclgevf_get_mbx_resp(struct hclgevf_dev *hdev, u16 code0, u16 code1, i++; }
+ /* ensure additional_info will be seen after received_resp */ + smp_rmb(); + if (i >= HCLGEVF_MAX_TRY_TIMES) { dev_err(&hdev->pdev->dev, "VF could not get mbx(%u,%u) resp(=%d) from PF in %d tries\n", @@ -178,6 +181,10 @@ static void hclgevf_handle_mbx_response(struct hclgevf_dev *hdev, resp->resp_status = hclgevf_resp_to_errno(resp_status); memcpy(resp->additional_info, req->msg.resp_data, HCLGE_MBX_MAX_RESP_DATA_SIZE * sizeof(u8)); + + /* ensure additional_info will be seen before setting received_resp */ + smp_wmb(); + if (match_id) { /* If match_id is not zero, it means PF support match_id. * if the match_id is right, VF get the right response, or