6.13-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Tim Schumacher tim.schumacher1@huawei.com
[ Upstream commit 6ae0042f4d3f331e841495eb0a3d51598e593ec2 ]
Subshell evaluations are not exempt from errexit, so if a command is not available, `which` will fail and exit the script as a whole. This causes the helpful error messages to not be printed if they are tacked on using a `$?` comparison.
Resolve the issue by using chains of logical operators, which are not subject to the effects of errexit.
Fixes: e37c1877ba5b1 ("scripts/selinux: modernize mdp") Signed-off-by: Tim Schumacher tim.schumacher1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Paul Moore paul@paul-moore.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- scripts/selinux/install_policy.sh | 15 ++++++--------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/selinux/install_policy.sh b/scripts/selinux/install_policy.sh index 24086793b0d8d..db40237e60ce7 100755 --- a/scripts/selinux/install_policy.sh +++ b/scripts/selinux/install_policy.sh @@ -6,27 +6,24 @@ if [ `id -u` -ne 0 ]; then exit 1 fi
-SF=`which setfiles` -if [ $? -eq 1 ]; then +SF=`which setfiles` || { echo "Could not find setfiles" echo "Do you have policycoreutils installed?" exit 1 -fi +}
-CP=`which checkpolicy` -if [ $? -eq 1 ]; then +CP=`which checkpolicy` || { echo "Could not find checkpolicy" echo "Do you have checkpolicy installed?" exit 1 -fi +} VERS=`$CP -V | awk '{print $1}'`
-ENABLED=`which selinuxenabled` -if [ $? -eq 1 ]; then +ENABLED=`which selinuxenabled` || { echo "Could not find selinuxenabled" echo "Do you have libselinux-utils installed?" exit 1 -fi +}
if selinuxenabled; then echo "SELinux is already enabled"