From: Kees Cook keescook@chromium.org
commit 00a02d0c502a06d15e07b857f8ff921e3e402675 upstream
If a seccomp user is not interested in Speculative Store Bypass mitigation by default, it can set the new SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_SPEC_ALLOW flag when adding filters.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook keescook@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse dwmw@amazon.co.uk Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat srivatsa@csail.mit.edu Reviewed-by: Matt Helsley (VMware) matt.helsley@gmail.com Reviewed-by: Alexey Makhalov amakhalov@vmware.com Reviewed-by: Bo Gan ganb@vmware.com ---
include/linux/seccomp.h | 3 + include/uapi/linux/seccomp.h | 4 + kernel/seccomp.c | 19 ++++-- tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/seccomp.h b/include/linux/seccomp.h index 2296e6b..5a53d34 100644 --- a/include/linux/seccomp.h +++ b/include/linux/seccomp.h @@ -3,7 +3,8 @@
#include <uapi/linux/seccomp.h>
-#define SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_MASK (SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC) +#define SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_MASK (SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC | \ + SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_SPEC_ALLOW)
#ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/seccomp.h b/include/uapi/linux/seccomp.h index 0f238a4..e4acb61 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/seccomp.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/seccomp.h @@ -15,7 +15,9 @@ #define SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER 1
/* Valid flags for SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER */ -#define SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC 1 +#define SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC (1UL << 0) +/* In v4.14+ SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_LOG is (1UL << 1) */ +#define SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_SPEC_ALLOW (1UL << 2)
/* * All BPF programs must return a 32-bit value. diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c index f33539f..4bb8a5a 100644 --- a/kernel/seccomp.c +++ b/kernel/seccomp.c @@ -230,7 +230,8 @@ static inline void spec_mitigate(struct task_struct *task, }
static inline void seccomp_assign_mode(struct task_struct *task, - unsigned long seccomp_mode) + unsigned long seccomp_mode, + unsigned long flags) { assert_spin_locked(&task->sighand->siglock);
@@ -240,8 +241,9 @@ static inline void seccomp_assign_mode(struct task_struct *task, * filter) is set. */ smp_mb__before_atomic(); - /* Assume seccomp processes want speculation flaw mitigation. */ - spec_mitigate(task, PR_SPEC_STORE_BYPASS); + /* Assume default seccomp processes want spec flaw mitigation. */ + if ((flags & SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_SPEC_ALLOW) == 0) + spec_mitigate(task, PR_SPEC_STORE_BYPASS); set_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_SECCOMP); }
@@ -309,7 +311,7 @@ static inline pid_t seccomp_can_sync_threads(void) * without dropping the locks. * */ -static inline void seccomp_sync_threads(void) +static inline void seccomp_sync_threads(unsigned long flags) { struct task_struct *thread, *caller;
@@ -350,7 +352,8 @@ static inline void seccomp_sync_threads(void) * allow one thread to transition the other. */ if (thread->seccomp.mode == SECCOMP_MODE_DISABLED) - seccomp_assign_mode(thread, SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER); + seccomp_assign_mode(thread, SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER, + flags); } }
@@ -469,7 +472,7 @@ static long seccomp_attach_filter(unsigned int flags,
/* Now that the new filter is in place, synchronize to all threads. */ if (flags & SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC) - seccomp_sync_threads(); + seccomp_sync_threads(flags);
return 0; } @@ -764,7 +767,7 @@ static long seccomp_set_mode_strict(void) #ifdef TIF_NOTSC disable_TSC(); #endif - seccomp_assign_mode(current, seccomp_mode); + seccomp_assign_mode(current, seccomp_mode, 0); ret = 0;
out: @@ -822,7 +825,7 @@ static long seccomp_set_mode_filter(unsigned int flags, /* Do not free the successfully attached filter. */ prepared = NULL;
- seccomp_assign_mode(current, seccomp_mode); + seccomp_assign_mode(current, seccomp_mode, flags); out: spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock); if (flags & SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c index 29487e0..b3f3454 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c @@ -1477,7 +1477,11 @@ TEST_F(TRACE_syscall, syscall_dropped) #endif
#ifndef SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC -#define SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC 1 +#define SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC (1UL << 0) +#endif + +#ifndef SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_SPEC_ALLOW +#define SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_SPEC_ALLOW (1UL << 2) #endif
#ifndef seccomp @@ -1576,6 +1580,78 @@ TEST(seccomp_syscall_mode_lock) } }
+/* + * Test detection of known and unknown filter flags. Userspace needs to be able + * to check if a filter flag is supported by the current kernel and a good way + * of doing that is by attempting to enter filter mode, with the flag bit in + * question set, and a NULL pointer for the _args_ parameter. EFAULT indicates + * that the flag is valid and EINVAL indicates that the flag is invalid. + */ +TEST(detect_seccomp_filter_flags) +{ + unsigned int flags[] = { SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC, + SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_SPEC_ALLOW }; + unsigned int flag, all_flags; + int i; + long ret; + + /* Test detection of known-good filter flags */ + for (i = 0, all_flags = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(flags); i++) { + int bits = 0; + + flag = flags[i]; + /* Make sure the flag is a single bit! */ + while (flag) { + if (flag & 0x1) + bits ++; + flag >>= 1; + } + ASSERT_EQ(1, bits); + flag = flags[i]; + + ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, flag, NULL); + ASSERT_NE(ENOSYS, errno) { + TH_LOG("Kernel does not support seccomp syscall!"); + } + EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret); + EXPECT_EQ(EFAULT, errno) { + TH_LOG("Failed to detect that a known-good filter flag (0x%X) is supported!", + flag); + } + + all_flags |= flag; + } + + /* Test detection of all known-good filter flags */ + ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, all_flags, NULL); + EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret); + EXPECT_EQ(EFAULT, errno) { + TH_LOG("Failed to detect that all known-good filter flags (0x%X) are supported!", + all_flags); + } + + /* Test detection of an unknown filter flag */ + flag = -1; + ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, flag, NULL); + EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret); + EXPECT_EQ(EINVAL, errno) { + TH_LOG("Failed to detect that an unknown filter flag (0x%X) is unsupported!", + flag); + } + + /* + * Test detection of an unknown filter flag that may simply need to be + * added to this test + */ + flag = flags[ARRAY_SIZE(flags) - 1] << 1; + ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, flag, NULL); + EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret); + EXPECT_EQ(EINVAL, errno) { + TH_LOG("Failed to detect that an unknown filter flag (0x%X) is unsupported! Does a new flag need to be added to this test?", + flag); + } +} + TEST(TSYNC_first) { struct sock_filter filter[] = {