On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 11:45:09PM -0600, Daniel Díaz wrote:
Hello!
On 24/11/23 11:50 a. m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.140 release. There are 297 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 26 Nov 2023 17:19:17 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.140-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
We are noticing a regression with ltp-syscalls' preadv03:
-----8<----- preadv03 preadv03 preadv03_64 preadv03_64 preadv03.c:102: TINFO: Using block size 512 preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'a' expectedly preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'a' expectedly preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'b' expectedly preadv03.c:102: TINFO: Using block size 512 preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 preadv03.c:66: TFAIL: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 0 bytes, expected 512 preadv03.c:102: TINFO: Using block size 512 preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 preadv03.c:66: TFAIL: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 0 bytes, expected 512 preadv03.c:102: TINFO: Using block size 512 preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'a' expectedly preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'a' expectedly preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'b' expectedly preadv03.c:102: TINFO: Using block size 512 preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 preadv03.c:66: TFAIL: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 0 bytes, expected 512 preadv03.c:102: TINFO: Using block size 512 preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 preadv03.c:66: TFAIL: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 0 bytes, expected 512 ----->8-----
This is seen in the following environments:
- dragonboard-845c
- juno-64k_page_size
- qemu-arm64
- qemu-armv7
- qemu-i386
- qemu-x86_64
- x86_64-clang
and on the following RC's:
- v5.10.202-rc1
- v5.15.140-rc1
- v6.1.64-rc1
(Note that the list might not be complete, because some branches failed to execute completely due to build issues reported elsewhere.)
Bisection in linux-5.15.y pointed to:
commit db85c7fff122c14bc5755e47b51fbfafae660235 Author: Jan Kara jack@suse.cz Date: Fri Oct 13 14:13:50 2023 +0200
ext4: properly sync file size update after O_SYNC direct IO commit 91562895f8030cb9a0470b1db49de79346a69f91 upstream.Reverting that commit made the test pass.
Odd. I'll go drop that from 5.10.y and 5.15.y now, thanks.
greg k-h