On 12. 05. 2023. 15:09, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 02:34:29PM +0200, Mirsad Todorovac wrote:
@@ -1011,6 +1016,11 @@ ssize_t trigger_batched_requests_async_store(struct device *dev, mutex_lock(&test_fw_mutex);
- if (test_fw_config->reqs) {
rc = -EBUSY;goto out_bail;- }
- test_fw_config->reqs = vzalloc(array3_size(sizeof(struct test_batched_req), test_fw_config->num_requests, 2));
I was just thinking, since returning -EBUSY for the case of already allocated test_fw_config->reqs was your suggestion and your idea, maybe it would be OK to properly reflect that in Co-developed-by: or Signed-off-by: , but if I understood well, the CoC requires that I am explicitly approved of those?
If everyone else is okay, let's just apply this as-is. You did all the hard bits.
regards, dan carpenter
If it is OK with you, then I hope I have your Reviewed-by:
I'm kinda still uncertain about the proper procedure. This certainly isn't "the perfect patch" :-)
Best regards, Mirsad