5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Sean Christopherson seanjc@google.com
[ Upstream commit f1fb088d9cecde5c3066d8ff8846789667519b7d ]
Take irqfds.lock when adding/deleting an IRQ bypass producer to ensure irqfd->producer isn't modified while kvm_irq_routing_update() is running. The only lock held when a producer is added/removed is irqbypass's mutex.
Fixes: 872768800652 ("KVM: x86: select IRQ_BYPASS_MANAGER") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson seanjc@google.com Message-ID: 20250404193923.1413163-5-seanjc@google.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini pbonzini@redhat.com [ Adjust context ] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 18 +++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c @@ -11417,16 +11417,22 @@ int kvm_arch_irq_bypass_add_producer(str { struct kvm_kernel_irqfd *irqfd = container_of(cons, struct kvm_kernel_irqfd, consumer); + struct kvm *kvm = irqfd->kvm; int ret;
- irqfd->producer = prod; kvm_arch_start_assignment(irqfd->kvm); + + spin_lock_irq(&kvm->irqfds.lock); + irqfd->producer = prod; + ret = kvm_x86_ops.update_pi_irte(irqfd->kvm, prod->irq, irqfd->gsi, 1); - if (ret) kvm_arch_end_assignment(irqfd->kvm);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&kvm->irqfds.lock); + + return ret; }
@@ -11436,9 +11442,9 @@ void kvm_arch_irq_bypass_del_producer(st int ret; struct kvm_kernel_irqfd *irqfd = container_of(cons, struct kvm_kernel_irqfd, consumer); + struct kvm *kvm = irqfd->kvm;
WARN_ON(irqfd->producer != prod); - irqfd->producer = NULL;
/* * When producer of consumer is unregistered, we change back to @@ -11446,11 +11452,17 @@ void kvm_arch_irq_bypass_del_producer(st * when the irq is masked/disabled or the consumer side (KVM * int this case doesn't want to receive the interrupts. */ + spin_lock_irq(&kvm->irqfds.lock); + irqfd->producer = NULL; + ret = kvm_x86_ops.update_pi_irte(irqfd->kvm, prod->irq, irqfd->gsi, 0); if (ret) printk(KERN_INFO "irq bypass consumer (token %p) unregistration" " fails: %d\n", irqfd->consumer.token, ret);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&kvm->irqfds.lock); + + kvm_arch_end_assignment(irqfd->kvm); }