From: John Johansen john.johansen@canonical.com
[ Upstream commit 9c4557efc558a68e4cd973490fd936d6e3414db8 ]
Fix the following lockdep warning
[ 1119.158984] ============================================ [ 1119.158988] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [ 1119.158996] 6.0.0-rc1+ #257 Tainted: G E N [ 1119.158999] -------------------------------------------- [ 1119.159001] bash/80100 is trying to acquire lock: [ 1119.159007] ffff88803e79b4a0 (&ns->lock/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: destroy_ns.part.0+0x43/0x140 [ 1119.159028] but task is already holding lock: [ 1119.159030] ffff8881009764a0 (&ns->lock/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: aa_remove_profiles+0x3f0/0x640 [ 1119.159040] other info that might help us debug this: [ 1119.159042] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 1119.159043] CPU0 [ 1119.159045] ---- [ 1119.159047] lock(&ns->lock/1); [ 1119.159051] lock(&ns->lock/1); [ 1119.159055] *** DEADLOCK ***
Which is caused by an incorrect lockdep nesting notation
Fixes: feb3c766a3ab ("apparmor: fix possible recursive lock warning in __aa_create_ns") Signed-off-by: John Johansen john.johansen@canonical.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- security/apparmor/policy.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/security/apparmor/policy.c b/security/apparmor/policy.c index 3a4293c46ad5..c4b5d5e3a721 100644 --- a/security/apparmor/policy.c +++ b/security/apparmor/policy.c @@ -1125,7 +1125,7 @@ ssize_t aa_remove_profiles(struct aa_ns *policy_ns, struct aa_label *subj,
if (!name) { /* remove namespace - can only happen if fqname[0] == ':' */ - mutex_lock_nested(&ns->parent->lock, ns->level); + mutex_lock_nested(&ns->parent->lock, ns->parent->level); __aa_bump_ns_revision(ns); __aa_remove_ns(ns); mutex_unlock(&ns->parent->lock);