On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 01:31:00AM +0100, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
+static int tpm_add_tpm2_char_device(struct tpm_chip *chip) +{
- int rc;
- device_initialize(&chip->devs);
- chip->devs.parent = chip->dev.parent;
- chip->devs.class = tpmrm_class;
- rc = dev_set_name(&chip->devs, "tpmrm%d", chip->dev_num);
- if (rc)
goto out_put_devs;- /*
* get extra reference on main device to hold on behalf of devs.* This holds the chip structure while cdevs is in use. The* corresponding put is in the tpm_devs_release.*/- get_device(&chip->dev);
- chip->devs.release = tpm_devs_release;
- chip->devs.devt =
MKDEV(MAJOR(tpm_devt), chip->dev_num + TPM_NUM_DEVICES);- cdev_init(&chip->cdevs, &tpmrm_fops);
- chip->cdevs.owner = THIS_MODULE;
- rc = cdev_device_add(&chip->cdevs, &chip->devs);
- if (rc) {
dev_err(&chip->devs,"unable to cdev_device_add() %s, major %d, minor %d, err=%d\n",dev_name(&chip->devs), MAJOR(chip->devs.devt),MINOR(chip->devs.devt), rc);goto out_put_devs;- }
- return 0;
+out_put_devs:
- put_device(&chip->devs);
I'd rather you organize this so chip->devs.release and the get_device is always sent instead of having the possiblity for a put_device that doesn't call release
Jason