6.17-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Wei Fang wei.fang@nxp.com
[ Upstream commit 9a060d0fac9e75524f72864adec6d8cdb70a5bca ]
There are currently two situations that can trigger the PTP interrupt, one is the PPS event, the other is the PEROUT event. However, the irq handler fec_pps_interrupt() does not check the irq event type and directly registers a PPS event into the system, but the event may be a PEROUT event. This is incorrect because PEROUT is an output signal, while PPS is the input of the kernel PPS system. Therefore, add a check for the event type, if pps_enable is true, it means that the current event is a PPS event, and then the PPS event is registered.
Fixes: 350749b909bf ("net: fec: Add support for periodic output signal of PPS") Signed-off-by: Wei Fang wei.fang@nxp.com Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251125085210.1094306-5-wei.fang@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni pabeni@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_ptp.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_ptp.c index ed5d59abeb537..4b7bad9a485df 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_ptp.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_ptp.c @@ -718,8 +718,11 @@ static irqreturn_t fec_pps_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id) fep->next_counter = (fep->next_counter + fep->reload_period) & fep->cc.mask;
- event.type = PTP_CLOCK_PPS; - ptp_clock_event(fep->ptp_clock, &event); + if (fep->pps_enable) { + event.type = PTP_CLOCK_PPS; + ptp_clock_event(fep->ptp_clock, &event); + } + return IRQ_HANDLED; }