14 Nov
2017
14 Nov
'17
6:07 p.m.
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 10:13:42PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
On 11/11/2017 05:38 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
A helper purported to look up a child node based on its name was using the wrong of-helper and ended up prematurely freeing the parent of-node while leaking any matching node.
To make things worse, any matching node would not even necessarily be a child node as the whole device tree was searched depth-first starting at the parent.
I think it is the same case as with the twl6040, there were no of_get_child_by_name() when this was done...
Thanks for fixing it!
Acked-by: Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfalusi@ti.com
Thanks for the acks.
Johan