From: Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org
[ Upstream commit 6ae865615fc43d014da2fd1f1bba7e81ee622d1b ]
The __put_user() macro evaluates it's @ptr argument inside the __uaccess_begin() / __uaccess_end() region. While this would normally not be expected to be an issue, an UBSAN bug (it ignored -fwrapv, fixed in GCC 8+) would transform the @ptr evaluation for:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c: if (unlikely(__put_user(offset, &urelocs[r-stack].presumed_offset))) {
into a signed-overflow-UB check and trigger the objtool AC validation.
Finish this commit:
2a418cf3f5f1 ("x86/uaccess: Don't leak the AC flag into __put_user() value evaluation")
and explicitly evaluate all 3 arguments early.
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap rdunlap@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) peterz@infradead.org Acked-by: Randy Dunlap rdunlap@infradead.org # build-tested Acked-by: Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org Cc: Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org Cc: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de Cc: luto@kernel.org Fixes: 2a418cf3f5f1 ("x86/uaccess: Don't leak the AC flag into __put_user() value evaluation") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190424072208.695962771@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar mingo@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h index f3aed639dccda..2b0dd1b9c2087 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h @@ -431,10 +431,11 @@ do { \ ({ \ __label__ __pu_label; \ int __pu_err = -EFAULT; \ - __typeof__(*(ptr)) __pu_val; \ - __pu_val = x; \ + __typeof__(*(ptr)) __pu_val = (x); \ + __typeof__(ptr) __pu_ptr = (ptr); \ + __typeof__(size) __pu_size = (size); \ __uaccess_begin(); \ - __put_user_size(__pu_val, (ptr), (size), __pu_label); \ + __put_user_size(__pu_val, __pu_ptr, __pu_size, __pu_label); \ __pu_err = 0; \ __pu_label: \ __uaccess_end(); \