On Fri, Dec 12, 2025 at 10:04:47AM +0530, Dutta, Anurag wrote:
On 09-12-2025 16:00, Mark Brown wrote:
Quoting seems messed up here - your whole mail is quoted.
I think we want this, possibly using pm_runtime_force_resume() instead (not 100% sure on that one, glancing at the documentation there might be issues though it feels like the intent of what we're doing here). Can you send a patch please?
Hi Mark If we use pm_runtime_force_resume(), then for CONFIG_PM_SLEEP, it will work. But, in case of !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP, pm_runtime_force_resume() returns -ENXIO, because of which :
Huh, hadn't noticed an interaction with PM_SLEEP. My thinking was partly that this is convenient since it lets you know if runtime PM isn't enabled and you need to unwind the clocks separately. But I don't super mind so long as we've got something that works.
Let me send a patch with pm_runtime_get_sync(). If changes are required, please let me know.
Yes, please.