From: Jason Gunthorpe jgg@nvidia.com
[ Upstream commit a862192e9227ad46e0447fd0a03869ba1b30d16f ]
Prefetch work in mlx5_ib_prefetch_mr_work can be queued and able to run concurrently with destruction of the implicit MR. The num_deferred_work was intended to serialize this, but there is a race:
CPU0 CPU1
mlx5_ib_free_implicit_mr() xa_erase(odp_mkeys) synchronize_srcu() __xa_erase(implicit_children) mlx5_ib_prefetch_mr_work() pagefault_mr() pagefault_implicit_mr() implicit_get_child_mr() xa_cmpxchg() atomic_dec_and_test(num_deferred_mr) wait_event(imr->q_deferred_work) ib_umem_odp_release(odp_imr) kfree(odp_imr)
At this point in mlx5_ib_free_implicit_mr() the implicit_children list is supposed to be empty forever so that destroy_unused_implicit_child_mr() and related are not and will not be running.
Since it is not empty the destroy_unused_implicit_child_mr() flow ends up touching deallocated memory as mlx5_ib_free_implicit_mr() already tore down the imr parent.
The solution is to flush out the prefetch wq by driving num_deferred_work to zero after creation of new prefetch work is blocked.
Fixes: 5256edcb98a1 ("RDMA/mlx5: Rework implicit ODP destroy") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200719065435.130722-1-leon@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky leonro@mellanox.com Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe jgg@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/odp.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/odp.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/odp.c index 3de7606d4a1a7..bdeb6500a9191 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/odp.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/odp.c @@ -601,6 +601,23 @@ void mlx5_ib_free_implicit_mr(struct mlx5_ib_mr *imr) */ synchronize_srcu(&dev->odp_srcu);
+ /* + * All work on the prefetch list must be completed, xa_erase() prevented + * new work from being created. + */ + wait_event(imr->q_deferred_work, !atomic_read(&imr->num_deferred_work)); + + /* + * At this point it is forbidden for any other thread to enter + * pagefault_mr() on this imr. It is already forbidden to call + * pagefault_mr() on an implicit child. Due to this additions to + * implicit_children are prevented. + */ + + /* + * Block destroy_unused_implicit_child_mr() from incrementing + * num_deferred_work. + */ xa_lock(&imr->implicit_children); xa_for_each (&imr->implicit_children, idx, mtt) { __xa_erase(&imr->implicit_children, idx); @@ -609,9 +626,8 @@ void mlx5_ib_free_implicit_mr(struct mlx5_ib_mr *imr) xa_unlock(&imr->implicit_children);
/* - * num_deferred_work can only be incremented inside the odp_srcu, or - * under xa_lock while the child is in the xarray. Thus at this point - * it is only decreasing, and all work holding it is now on the wq. + * Wait for any concurrent destroy_unused_implicit_child_mr() to + * complete. */ wait_event(imr->q_deferred_work, !atomic_read(&imr->num_deferred_work));