On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:30 AM Liam R. Howlett Liam.Howlett@oracle.com wrote:
When the calling function fails after the dup_anon_vma(), the duplication of the anon_vma is not being undone. Add the necessary unlink_anon_vma() call to the error paths that are missing them.
This issue showed up during inspection of the error path in vma_merge() for an unrelated vma iterator issue.
Users may experience increased memory usage, which may be problematic as the failure would likely be caused by a low memory situation.
Fixes: d4af56c5c7c6 ("mm: start tracking VMAs with maple tree") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jann Horn jannh@google.com Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett Liam.Howlett@oracle.com
mm/mmap.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c index acb7dea49e23..f9f0a5fe4db4 100644 --- a/mm/mmap.c +++ b/mm/mmap.c @@ -583,11 +583,12 @@ static inline void vma_complete(struct vma_prepare *vp,
- dup_anon_vma() - Helper function to duplicate anon_vma
- @dst: The destination VMA
- @src: The source VMA
*/
- @dup: Pointer to the destination VMA when successful.
- Returns: 0 on success.
static inline int dup_anon_vma(struct vm_area_struct *dst,
struct vm_area_struct *src)
struct vm_area_struct *src, struct vm_area_struct **dup){ /* * Easily overlooked: when mprotect shifts the boundary, make sure the @@ -595,9 +596,15 @@ static inline int dup_anon_vma(struct vm_area_struct *dst, * anon pages imported. */ if (src->anon_vma && !dst->anon_vma) {
int ret;vma_assert_write_locked(dst); dst->anon_vma = src->anon_vma;
return anon_vma_clone(dst, src);
ret = anon_vma_clone(dst, src);if (ret)return ret;*dup = dst; } return 0;@@ -624,6 +631,7 @@ int vma_expand(struct vma_iterator *vmi, struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start, unsigned long end, pgoff_t pgoff, struct vm_area_struct *next) {
struct vm_area_struct *anon_dup = NULL; bool remove_next = false; struct vma_prepare vp;@@ -633,7 +641,7 @@ int vma_expand(struct vma_iterator *vmi, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
remove_next = true; vma_start_write(next);
ret = dup_anon_vma(vma, next);
ret = dup_anon_vma(vma, next, &anon_dup); if (ret) return ret;
Shouldn't the above be changed to a "goto nomem" instead of "return ret" ?
}@@ -661,6 +669,8 @@ int vma_expand(struct vma_iterator *vmi, struct vm_area_struct *vma, return 0;
nomem:
if (anon_dup)unlink_anon_vmas(anon_dup); return -ENOMEM;}
@@ -860,6 +870,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct *vma_merge(struct vma_iterator *vmi, struct mm_struct *mm, { struct vm_area_struct *curr, *next, *res; struct vm_area_struct *vma, *adjust, *remove, *remove2;
struct vm_area_struct *anon_dup = NULL; struct vma_prepare vp; pgoff_t vma_pgoff; int err = 0;@@ -927,18 +938,18 @@ struct vm_area_struct *vma_merge(struct vma_iterator *vmi, struct mm_struct *mm, vma_start_write(next); remove = next; /* case 1 */ vma_end = next->vm_end;
err = dup_anon_vma(prev, next);
err = dup_anon_vma(prev, next, &anon_dup); if (curr) { /* case 6 */ vma_start_write(curr); remove = curr; remove2 = next; if (!next->anon_vma)
err = dup_anon_vma(prev, curr);
err = dup_anon_vma(prev, curr, &anon_dup); } } else if (merge_prev) { /* case 2 */ if (curr) { vma_start_write(curr);
err = dup_anon_vma(prev, curr);
err = dup_anon_vma(prev, curr, &anon_dup); if (end == curr->vm_end) { /* case 7 */ remove = curr; } else { /* case 5 */@@ -954,7 +965,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct *vma_merge(struct vma_iterator *vmi, struct mm_struct *mm, vma_end = addr; adjust = next; adj_start = -(prev->vm_end - addr);
err = dup_anon_vma(next, prev);
err = dup_anon_vma(next, prev, &anon_dup); } else { /* * Note that cases 3 and 8 are the ONLY ones where prev@@ -968,7 +979,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct *vma_merge(struct vma_iterator *vmi, struct mm_struct *mm, vma_pgoff = curr->vm_pgoff; vma_start_write(curr); remove = curr;
err = dup_anon_vma(next, curr);
err = dup_anon_vma(next, curr, &anon_dup); } } }@@ -1018,6 +1029,9 @@ struct vm_area_struct *vma_merge(struct vma_iterator *vmi, struct mm_struct *mm, return res;
prealloc_fail:
if (anon_dup)unlink_anon_vmas(anon_dup);
Maybe a stupid question, but why can't we do this unlinking inside dup_anon_vma() itself when anon_vma_clone() fails? That would eliminate the need for the out parameter in that function. I suspect that there is a reason for that which I'm missing.
anon_vma_fail: vma_iter_set(vmi, addr); vma_iter_load(vmi); -- 2.40.1