On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 02:17:12AM +0000, Huang, Kai wrote:
On Fri, 2023-05-26 at 01:58 +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
TDX code is going to provide guest.enc_status_change_prepare() that is able to fail.
Add a way to return an error from the callback.
While there, fix enc_status_change_finish_noop(). It is defined as always-fail now which doesn't make sense for noop.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h | 2 +- arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c | 4 ++-- arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt_amd.c | 4 +++- arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c | 3 ++- 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h index 88085f369ff6..1ca9701917c5 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ struct x86_init_acpi {
- @enc_cache_flush_required Returns true if a cache flush is needed before changing page encryption status
*/ struct x86_guest {
- void (*enc_status_change_prepare)(unsigned long vaddr, int npages, bool enc);
- bool (*enc_status_change_prepare)(unsigned long vaddr, int npages, bool enc);
[...]
@@ -2151,7 +2151,8 @@ static int __set_memory_enc_pgtable(unsigned long addr, int numpages, bool enc) cpa_flush(&cpa, x86_platform.guest.enc_cache_flush_required()); /* Notify hypervisor that we are about to set/clr encryption attribute. */
- x86_platform.guest.enc_status_change_prepare(addr, numpages, enc);
- if (!x86_platform.guest.enc_status_change_prepare(addr, numpages, enc))
return -EIO;
The name "enc_status_change_prepare()" sounds like an action, but not some true/false condition check. I think it's more reasonable to make it return 'int', and returning 0 means successful?
It copies convention of enc_status_change_finish(). I don't think we need anything more than binary pass/fail. We can change it in the future if needed.