6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Henry Martin bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com
[ Upstream commit 484d3f15cc6cbaa52541d6259778e715b2c83c54 ]
cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() can return NULL when the target CPU is not present in the policy->cpus mask. scmi_cpufreq_get_rate() does not check for this case, which results in a NULL pointer dereference.
Add NULL check after cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() to prevent this issue.
Fixes: 99d6bdf33877 ("cpufreq: add support for CPU DVFS based on SCMI message protocol") Signed-off-by: Henry Martin bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com Acked-by: Sudeep Holla sudeep.holla@arm.com Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c index 07d6f9a9b7c82..7e7c1613a67c6 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c @@ -34,11 +34,17 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver scmi_cpufreq_driver;
static unsigned int scmi_cpufreq_get_rate(unsigned int cpu) { - struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(cpu); - struct scmi_data *priv = policy->driver_data; + struct cpufreq_policy *policy; + struct scmi_data *priv; unsigned long rate; int ret;
+ policy = cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(cpu); + if (unlikely(!policy)) + return 0; + + priv = policy->driver_data; + ret = perf_ops->freq_get(ph, priv->domain_id, &rate, false); if (ret) return 0;