5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Steven Rostedt (Google) rostedt@goodmis.org
[ Upstream commit 68282dd930ea38b068ce2c109d12405f40df3f93 ]
The "shortest_full" variable is used to keep track of the waiter that is waiting for the smallest amount on the ring buffer before being woken up. When a tasks waits on the ring buffer, it passes in a "full" value that is a percentage. 0 means wake up on any data. 1-100 means wake up from 1% to 100% full buffer.
As all waiters are on the same wait queue, the wake up happens for the waiter with the smallest percentage.
The problem is that the smallest_full on the cpu_buffer that stores the smallest amount doesn't get reset when all the waiters are woken up. It does get reset when the ring buffer is reset (echo > /sys/kernel/tracing/trace).
This means that tasks may be woken up more often then when they want to be. Instead, have the shortest_full field get reset just before waking up all the tasks. If the tasks wait again, they will update the shortest_full before sleeping.
Also add locking around setting of shortest_full in the poll logic, and change "work" to "rbwork" to match the variable name for rb_irq_work structures that are used in other places.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20240308202431.948914369@goodmis....
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Masami Hiramatsu mhiramat@kernel.org Cc: Mark Rutland mark.rutland@arm.com Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com Cc: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org Cc: linke li lilinke99@qq.com Cc: Rabin Vincent rabin@rab.in Fixes: 2c2b0a78b3739 ("ring-buffer: Add percentage of ring buffer full to wake up reader") Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) rostedt@goodmis.org Stable-dep-of: 8145f1c35fa6 ("ring-buffer: Fix full_waiters_pending in poll") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c index 5b665e5991bf7..5465f4c950f27 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c @@ -831,8 +831,19 @@ static void rb_wake_up_waiters(struct irq_work *work)
wake_up_all(&rbwork->waiters); if (rbwork->full_waiters_pending || rbwork->wakeup_full) { + /* Only cpu_buffer sets the above flags */ + struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer = + container_of(rbwork, struct ring_buffer_per_cpu, irq_work); + + /* Called from interrupt context */ + raw_spin_lock(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock); rbwork->wakeup_full = false; rbwork->full_waiters_pending = false; + + /* Waking up all waiters, they will reset the shortest full */ + cpu_buffer->shortest_full = 0; + raw_spin_unlock(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock); + wake_up_all(&rbwork->full_waiters); } } @@ -999,28 +1010,33 @@ __poll_t ring_buffer_poll_wait(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu, struct file *filp, poll_table *poll_table, int full) { struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer; - struct rb_irq_work *work; + struct rb_irq_work *rbwork;
if (cpu == RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS) { - work = &buffer->irq_work; + rbwork = &buffer->irq_work; full = 0; } else { if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, buffer->cpumask)) return EPOLLERR;
cpu_buffer = buffer->buffers[cpu]; - work = &cpu_buffer->irq_work; + rbwork = &cpu_buffer->irq_work; }
if (full) { - poll_wait(filp, &work->full_waiters, poll_table); - work->full_waiters_pending = true; + unsigned long flags; + + poll_wait(filp, &rbwork->full_waiters, poll_table); + + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags); + rbwork->full_waiters_pending = true; if (!cpu_buffer->shortest_full || cpu_buffer->shortest_full > full) cpu_buffer->shortest_full = full; + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags); } else { - poll_wait(filp, &work->waiters, poll_table); - work->waiters_pending = true; + poll_wait(filp, &rbwork->waiters, poll_table); + rbwork->waiters_pending = true; }
/*