5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Kemeng Shi shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
[ Upstream commit 497885f72d930305d8e61b6b616b22b4da1adf90 ]
The "i" returned from mb_find_next_zero_bit is in cluster unit and we need offset "block" corresponding to "i" in block unit. Convert "i" to block unit to fix the unit mismatch.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi shikemeng@huaweicloud.com Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo ojaswin@linux.ibm.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230603150327.3596033-3-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o tytso@mit.edu Stable-dep-of: 3f4830abd236 ("ext4: fix potential unnitialized variable") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c index c2fcdee223317..383703e20ea36 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c @@ -5886,6 +5886,7 @@ static ext4_fsblk_t ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple(handle_t *handle, { struct buffer_head *bitmap_bh; struct super_block *sb = ar->inode->i_sb; + struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb); ext4_group_t group; ext4_grpblk_t blkoff; ext4_grpblk_t max = EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb); @@ -5914,7 +5915,8 @@ static ext4_fsblk_t ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple(handle_t *handle, if (i >= max) break; if (ext4_fc_replay_check_excluded(sb, - ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, group) + i)) { + ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, group) + + EXT4_C2B(sbi, i))) { blkoff = i + 1; } else break; @@ -5931,7 +5933,7 @@ static ext4_fsblk_t ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple(handle_t *handle, return 0; }
- block = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, group) + i; + block = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, group) + EXT4_C2B(sbi, i); ext4_mb_mark_bb(sb, block, 1, 1); ar->len = 1;