5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Bang Li libang.linuxer@gmail.com
[ Upstream commit f92ca72b0263d601807bbd23ed25cbe6f4da89f4 ]
iput() has already judged the incoming parameter, so there is no need to repeat the judgment here.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220311151240.62045-1-libang.linuxer@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Bang Li libang.linuxer@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jan Kara jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever chuck.lever@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- fs/notify/fsnotify.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/notify/fsnotify.c b/fs/notify/fsnotify.c index 494f653efbc6e..70a8516b78bc5 100644 --- a/fs/notify/fsnotify.c +++ b/fs/notify/fsnotify.c @@ -70,8 +70,7 @@ static void fsnotify_unmount_inodes(struct super_block *sb) spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); spin_unlock(&sb->s_inode_list_lock);
- if (iput_inode) - iput(iput_inode); + iput(iput_inode);
/* for each watch, send FS_UNMOUNT and then remove it */ fsnotify_inode(inode, FS_UNMOUNT); @@ -85,8 +84,7 @@ static void fsnotify_unmount_inodes(struct super_block *sb) } spin_unlock(&sb->s_inode_list_lock);
- if (iput_inode) - iput(iput_inode); + iput(iput_inode); }
void fsnotify_sb_delete(struct super_block *sb)