Alain Volmatalain.volmat@foss.st.com wrote:
Hi,
I probably went a bit fast on the commit message. It seems to me that the Fixes line would be probably better with below one instead.
Fixes: dd86dc2f9ae1 ("drm/sti: implement atomic_check for the planes")
The same fix is actually necessary for all planes (cursor / gdp / hqvdp), which is related to the same original commit. Hence sti_cursor/sti_gdp and sti_hqvdp.
Would you be ok to have those 3 fixes within a commit ?
Regards, Alain
On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 07:25:43PM +0200, Alain Volmat wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your patch.
Acked-by: Alain Volmat alain.volmat@foss.st.com
Regards, Alain
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 01:26:52PM +0800, Ma Ke wrote:
The return value of drm_atomic_get_crtc_state() needs to be checked. To avoid use of error pointer 'crtc_state' in case of the failure.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: dec92020671c ("drm: Use the state pointer directly in planes atomic_check")
Signed-off-by: Ma Ke make24@iscas.ac.cn
drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_cursor.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_cursor.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_cursor.c index db0a1eb53532..e460f5ba2d87 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_cursor.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_cursor.c @@ -200,6 +200,8 @@ static int sti_cursor_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *drm_plane, return 0; crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_crtc_state(state, crtc);
- if (IS_ERR(crtc_state))
return PTR_ERR(crtc_state);-- 2.25.1
Hi，
I appreciate your guidance regarding the modification of the Fixes tag. As your observation, I have also identified the additional instance (sti_hqvdp_atomic_check) where a similar issue exists, necessitating the same patch. I have recognized the problem and was in the process of reporting it. To prevent any confusion and ensure accurate reporting, I have updated the patch already submitted as patch v2. The issue in sti_hqvdp_atomic_check has also been reported, and I kindly request you to review it.(I am not very familiar with how to combine the reporting of vulnerabilities in multiple functions, so to avoid unnecessary errors or confusion, I reported them one by one. Hope for your understanding.) Thank you for your prompt response. Your assistance is invaluable to me.
Best regards, Ma Ke