31 Aug
2018
31 Aug
'18
6:47 a.m.
On 08/29/2018, 06:13 PM, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
I would just do: if (!retval) tty->count++; here. Nobody from ldiscs should rely on tty->count.
I thought about that and probably should have described in commit message why I haven't done that: I prefer to keep it as was as I did Cc stable tree - to keep the chance of regression to minimum.
I agree that your way is cleaner, but probably it may be done as cleanup on top for linux-next..
Agreed, so care to cook it up as 5/4 in this series :)?
thanks,
--
js
suse labs