6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Qu Wenruo wqu@suse.com
commit dfb92681a19e1d5172420baa242806414b3eff6f upstream.
[BUG] There is a bug report in the mailing list where btrfs_run_delayed_refs() failed to drop the ref count for logical 25870311358464 num_bytes 2113536.
The involved leaf dump looks like this:
item 166 key (25870311358464 168 2113536) itemoff 10091 itemsize 50 extent refs 1 gen 84178 flags 1 ref#0: shared data backref parent 32399126528000 count 0 <<< ref#1: shared data backref parent 31808973717504 count 1
Notice the count number is 0.
[CAUSE] There is no concrete evidence yet, but considering 0 -> 1 is also a single bit flipped, it's possible that hardware memory bitflip is involved, causing the on-disk extent tree to be corrupted.
[FIX] To prevent us reading such corrupted extent item, or writing such damaged extent item back to disk, enhance the handling of BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_REF_KEY and BTRFS_SHARED_DATA_REF_KEY keys for both inlined and key items, to detect such 0 ref count and reject them.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/7c69dd49-c346-4806-86e7-e6f863a66f48@app... Reported-by: Frankie Fisher frankie@terrorise.me.uk Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana fdmanana@suse.com Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo wqu@suse.com Reviewed-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c @@ -1527,6 +1527,11 @@ static int check_extent_item(struct exte dref_offset, fs_info->sectorsize); return -EUCLEAN; } + if (unlikely(btrfs_extent_data_ref_count(leaf, dref) == 0)) { + extent_err(leaf, slot, + "invalid data ref count, should have non-zero value"); + return -EUCLEAN; + } inline_refs += btrfs_extent_data_ref_count(leaf, dref); break; /* Contains parent bytenr and ref count */ @@ -1539,6 +1544,11 @@ static int check_extent_item(struct exte inline_offset, fs_info->sectorsize); return -EUCLEAN; } + if (unlikely(btrfs_shared_data_ref_count(leaf, sref) == 0)) { + extent_err(leaf, slot, + "invalid shared data ref count, should have non-zero value"); + return -EUCLEAN; + } inline_refs += btrfs_shared_data_ref_count(leaf, sref); break; case BTRFS_EXTENT_OWNER_REF_KEY: @@ -1611,8 +1621,18 @@ static int check_simple_keyed_refs(struc { u32 expect_item_size = 0;
- if (key->type == BTRFS_SHARED_DATA_REF_KEY) + if (key->type == BTRFS_SHARED_DATA_REF_KEY) { + struct btrfs_shared_data_ref *sref; + + sref = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, slot, struct btrfs_shared_data_ref); + if (unlikely(btrfs_shared_data_ref_count(leaf, sref) == 0)) { + extent_err(leaf, slot, + "invalid shared data backref count, should have non-zero value"); + return -EUCLEAN; + } + expect_item_size = sizeof(struct btrfs_shared_data_ref); + }
if (unlikely(btrfs_item_size(leaf, slot) != expect_item_size)) { generic_err(leaf, slot, @@ -1689,6 +1709,11 @@ static int check_extent_data_ref(struct offset, leaf->fs_info->sectorsize); return -EUCLEAN; } + if (unlikely(btrfs_extent_data_ref_count(leaf, dref) == 0)) { + extent_err(leaf, slot, + "invalid extent data backref count, should have non-zero value"); + return -EUCLEAN; + } } return 0; }