Hi Marcin,
Since it's been a week, could you confirm the patch is ok as-is or do you think some comment(s) from James should be incorporated ?
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 3:17 PM, James Hogan jhogan@kernel.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:00:59PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
From: Marcin Nowakowski marcin.nowakowski@mips.com
Change 73fbc1eba7ff added a fix to ensure that the memory range between
Please refer to commits with e.g. commit 73fbc1eba7ff ("MIPS: fix mem=X@Y commandline processing").
PHYS_OFFSET and low memory address specified by mem= cmdline argument is not later processed by free_all_bootmem. This change was incorrect for systems where the commandline specifies more than 1 mem argument, as it will cause all memory between PHYS_OFFSET and each of the memory offsets to be marked as reserved, which results in parts of the RAM marked as reserved (Creator CI20's u-boot has a default commandline argument 'mem=256M@0x0 mem=768M@0x30000000').
Change the behaviour to ensure that only the range between PHYS_OFFSET and the lowest start address of the memories is marked as protected.
This change also ensures that the range is marked protected even if it's only defined through the devicetree and not only via commandline arguments.
Reported-by: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malaterre@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Marcin Nowakowski marcin.nowakowski@mips.com Fixes: 73fbc1eba7ff ("MIPS: fix mem=X@Y commandline processing") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.11
I'm guessing that should technically be v4.11+
My fault, if this is the only change, I can re-submit.
v2: Use updated email adress, add tag for stable. arch/mips/kernel/setup.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/setup.c b/arch/mips/kernel/setup.c index 702c678de116..f19d61224c71 100644 --- a/arch/mips/kernel/setup.c +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/setup.c @@ -375,6 +375,7 @@ static void __init bootmem_init(void) unsigned long reserved_end; unsigned long mapstart = ~0UL; unsigned long bootmap_size;
phys_addr_t ramstart = ~0UL;Although practically it might not matter, technically phys_addr_t may be 64-bits (CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT) even on a 32-bit kernels, in which case ~0UL may not be sufficiently large.
Maybe that should be ~(phys_addr_t)0, or perhaps (phys_addr_t)ULLONG_MAX to match add_memory_region().
bool bootmap_valid = false; int i;@@ -395,6 +396,21 @@ static void __init bootmem_init(void) max_low_pfn = 0;
/*
* Reserve any memory between the start of RAM and PHYS_OFFSET*/for (i = 0; i < boot_mem_map.nr_map; i++) {if (boot_mem_map.map[i].type != BOOT_MEM_RAM)continue;ramstart = min(ramstart, boot_mem_map.map[i].addr);Is it worth incorporating this into the existing loop below ...
}if (ramstart > PHYS_OFFSET)add_memory_region(PHYS_OFFSET, ramstart - PHYS_OFFSET,BOOT_MEM_RESERVED);... and this then placed below that loop?
Otherwise I can't find fault with this patch, though i'm not intimately familiar with bootmem.
Cheers James
/* * Find the highest page frame number we have available. */ for (i = 0; i < boot_mem_map.nr_map; i++) {@@ -664,9 +680,6 @@ static int __init early_parse_mem(char *p)
add_memory_region(start, size, BOOT_MEM_RAM);
if (start && start > PHYS_OFFSET)add_memory_region(PHYS_OFFSET, start - PHYS_OFFSET,BOOT_MEM_RESERVED); return 0;} early_param("mem", early_parse_mem); -- 2.11.0