From: Zheng Wang zyytlz.wz@163.com
[ Upstream commit ea4f1009408efb4989a0f139b70fb338e7f687d0 ]
In xen_9pfs_front_probe, it calls xen_9pfs_front_alloc_dataring to init priv->rings and bound &ring->work with p9_xen_response.
When it calls xen_9pfs_front_event_handler to handle IRQ requests, it will finally call schedule_work to start the work.
When we call xen_9pfs_front_remove to remove the driver, there may be a sequence as follows:
Fix it by finishing the work before cleanup in xen_9pfs_front_free.
Note that, this bug is found by static analysis, which might be false positive.
CPU0 CPU1
|p9_xen_response xen_9pfs_front_remove| xen_9pfs_front_free| kfree(priv) | //free priv | |p9_tag_lookup |//use priv->client
Fixes: 71ebd71921e4 ("xen/9pfs: connect to the backend") Signed-off-by: Zheng Wang zyytlz.wz@163.com Reviewed-by: Michal Swiatkowski michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Eric Van Hensbergen ericvh@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- net/9p/trans_xen.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/9p/trans_xen.c b/net/9p/trans_xen.c index 9e4da8c1b907e..99e6b2483311c 100644 --- a/net/9p/trans_xen.c +++ b/net/9p/trans_xen.c @@ -300,6 +300,10 @@ static void xen_9pfs_front_free(struct xen_9pfs_front_priv *priv) write_unlock(&xen_9pfs_lock);
for (i = 0; i < priv->num_rings; i++) { + struct xen_9pfs_dataring *ring = &priv->rings[i]; + + cancel_work_sync(&ring->work); + if (!priv->rings[i].intf) break; if (priv->rings[i].irq > 0)