On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 05:43:40AM -0700, Georgi Djakov wrote:
From: Mike Rapoport rppt@linux.ibm.com
[ Upstream commit a9c38c5d267cb94871dfa2de5539c92025c855d7 ]
dma_map_resource() uses pfn_valid() to ensure the range is not RAM. However, pfn_valid() only checks for availability of the memory map for a PFN but it does not ensure that the PFN is actually backed by RAM.
As dma_map_resource() is the only method in DMA mapping APIs that has this check, simply drop the pfn_valid() test from dma_map_resource().
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210824173741.GC623@arm.com/ Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport rppt@linux.ibm.com Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig hch@lst.de Acked-by: David Hildenbrand david@redhat.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210930013039.11260-2-rppt@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Will Deacon will@kernel.org Fixes: 859a85ddf90e ("mm: remove pfn_valid_within() and CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Yl0IZWT2nsiYtqBT@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Georgi Djakov quic_c_gdjako@quicinc.com
kernel/dma/mapping.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
I took this, but I do not understand why patch 2/2 in this series is needed, as Sasha points out. Cleanups are nice, but is it necessary here?
thanks,
greg k-h